Get your free personalized podcast brief
We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
The common narrative that most political violence comes from the right is based on data starting in the 1990s. Analysis since 2015 shows a new era of 'violent populism' with violence becoming heavily balanced between the left and the right.
Related Insights
Political violence and extreme polarization are symptoms of deeper economic anxieties. When people feel economically insecure, they retreat into tribal identities and become susceptible to narratives of anger, which can escalate into violence.
The number one threat to the United States is not a foreign government or fringe militia, but tens of millions of mainstream Americans who now support political violence. This normalization of violence within the body politic represents a new, more dangerous era.
The stereotype of a young, rural, unemployed male extremist is false. Data from January 6th shows 45% were business owners or white-collar professionals like doctors and engineers. The new face of political violence is educated, employed, and middle-class.
Recent survey data reveals a shocking escalation: 65 million Americans support using force to prevent Donald Trump from being president, while 40 million support him using the military on protestors. This totals over 100 million Americans endorsing political violence.
Economic downturns fuel populism on both the left and right. These movements thrive on a confrontational, non-compromising stance, which forces a "pick a side" dynamic that eradicates the political middle ground and escalates conflict.
The US is not heading toward a civil war defined by organized armies. Instead, it's experiencing "violent populism," where political violence becomes normalized on both the left and right. This creates a dangerous environment where executive power, such as the use of martial law, expands under the pretext of maintaining order.
The inability for young people to afford assets like housing creates massive inequality and fear. This economic desperation makes them susceptible to populist leaders who redirect their anger towards political opponents, ultimately sparking violence.
The notion that identitarianism is exclusive to the left ("woke") is outdated. A powerful, mirrored version has solidified on the right ("Groypers"), indicating that identity-based politics has become a central, and polarizing, framework across the entire political spectrum.
The root cause of America's era of violent populism is not a single politician but two major social changes reaching a tipping point: the transition to a white-minority democracy and a massive wealth transfer to the top 1%, creating a zero-sum mentality for everyone else.
Public discourse on political violence is often distorted. Data suggests a nuanced reality: left-wing groups may commit more frequent, lower-level acts of violence (e.g., assault at protests), while right-wing extremists are responsible for less frequent but far more lethal attacks with higher body counts. Acknowledging this distinction is key to an accurate threat assessment.
