Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Established brands often abandon their most powerful assets, like Weetabix's slogan, because a new CMO or agency wants to create something fresh. This common mistake discards years of built-up brand equity for the sake of novelty.

Related Insights

A full rebrand risks alienating loyal customers by erasing a brand's heritage. Lancer Skincare's CMO advocates for a gradual "refresh" that modernizes elements like packaging and messaging while preserving core brand identifiers, ensuring continued recognition and trust.

True brand asset mastery isn't rigid consistency, which can lead to 'branded wallpaper.' It's about playfulness. McDonald's constantly remixes its golden arches and colors to keep the brand fresh and interesting while remaining instantly recognizable.

Established brands are making a critical error by copying the performance marketing playbook of startups. This playbook, focused on short-term, measurable actions, is antithetical to the long-term, mass-reach brand building that made them successful in the first place and still works today.

Creatively reinterpreting distinctive brand assets can be highly effective, making a brand feel fresh yet familiar. However, this is a privilege earned only through long-term, consistent reinforcement. Mark Ritson suggests a "40 years of enforcement" rule before a brand can start playing with its core assets.

For legacy brands, transformation starts with fixing the basics: brand growth strategy, consumer insights, positioning, and packaging. Only after completing these foundational 'brand tune-ups' can a company effectively 'punch above its weight' with culturally relevant marketing.

After Coke's CMO tried to replace a 20-year-old Christmas ad, public outcry forced its return. This highlights the power of long-term brand assets and "compound creativity," where consistent use builds immense cultural equity that new campaigns cannot replicate.

Founders and CMOs get bored of their own messaging long before customers do. James Watt argues that building an iconic brand requires the discipline to be painstakingly consistent for a decade, resisting the entrepreneurial urge to constantly change things.

Marketers at established companies should act as gardeners, not builders. Their role is to carefully prune and nurture the brand's existing assets (logos, colors, slogans) that are proven to thrive, rather than constantly destroying the old to plant something new and unproven.

Marketers often fail by constantly changing brand elements, preventing them from sticking. The success of a mascot or logo depends less on the specific choice (e.g., raccoon vs. squirrel) and more on the intense, long-term commitment to using it consistently.

New brand managers often change successful strategies just to put their personal stamp on the brand. A long-tenured agency partner can act as a vital custodian of brand equity, leveraging their deep institutional knowledge to push back against short-sighted, unnecessary changes and maintain consistency.

Iconic Brands Ditch Their Best Assets to Let New Agencies or CMOs Make Their Mark | RiffOn