Emerging market credit spreads are tightening while developed markets' are widening. This divergence is not a fundamental mispricing but is explained by unique, positive developments in specific sovereigns like post-election Argentina and bonds in Venezuela on hopes of restructuring.

Given the unreliability of polling, markets will wait for tangible results before reacting. The composition of congress will be the first concrete signal, with a divided or right-leaning legislature seen as a positive check on executive power. This could trigger currency rallies well before the final presidential outcome is known.

Once a destination for American economic opportunity, Venezuela's economy imploded after nationalizing its top industry and imposing widespread price controls. This recent, dramatic collapse serves as a powerful, real-world example of how such policies can lead to ruin, yet they remain popular.

Despite strong year-to-date performance in what feels like a resilient market, seasoned EM sovereign credit investors are publicly emphasizing caution. They recognize that stretched valuations, described as a 'glass overflowing', and potential US recession risks create significant downside vulnerability.

A significant gap exists between optimistic market pricing and the cautious stance of credit rating agencies. While investors are rewarding frontier economies for recent reforms, agencies are waiting for a stronger, longer-term track record of fiscal discipline and stability before issuing upgrades, particularly in African nations.

The focus in distressed sovereign debt has shifted beyond country fundamentals. Investors are now performing deep analysis on novel state-contingent debt instruments created during recent restructurings in countries like Zambia and Sri Lanka, scrutinizing their complex trigger mechanisms and payout structures for alpha.

Deteriorating debt fundamentals are a known long-term risk, but markets often remain complacent until a specific political event, like an election or leadership change, acts as a trigger. These upheavals force an immediate re-evaluation of what is sustainable, transforming abstract fiscal worries into concrete, costly market volatility.

With the exception of Brazil's BRL, investor positioning in Latam currencies is not over-extended. This means the magnitude of currency moves should be similar in either a government continuity or transition scenario, creating a balanced risk profile rather than a one-sided vulnerability to a specific political outcome.

Despite political polarization, FX volatility is expected to be less than half of the 20% depreciation seen in the last cycle. This is due to a less tense social fabric, more moderate economic agendas, and strong institutions that have proven effective at limiting executive power and radical reforms.