Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

After being conned out of $1 million by a sham company, Sharran Srivatsaa developed a framework for future investments: Good People (trust but verify), Good Intentions (plan for the worst), Good Rationale (scrutinize the numbers), and Good Contracts (ensure enforceability).

Related Insights

The traditional 'risks and attractions' list creates a false opposition. A better framework is asking, 'What do you have to believe to be true to be attracted to this?' This reframes the diligence process constructively, acknowledging that the goal of an investor is to find reasons to put money to work, not just to identify risks.

To truly understand a potential financial partner, the Chomps team went beyond the supplied references. They found a founder whose company didn't succeed under the PE firm's investment. His positive review of the partner's character, despite the negative outcome, provided the most powerful signal of trust.

Effective due diligence isn't a checklist, but the collection of many small data points—revenue, team retention, customer love, CVC interest. A strong investment is a "beam" where all points align positively. Any misalignment creates doubt and likely signals a "no," adhering to the "if it's not a hell yes, it's a no" rule.

Instead of walking away immediately upon finding inaccuracies, quantify the risk. Rebuild your business case assuming the worst probable scenario based on the discovered misrepresentations. If the deal remains net positive even with these new, pessimistic assumptions, it may still be a viable investment.

An operator's framework for CPG due diligence evaluates deals in a specific, non-financial-first order: 1) founder, 2) product-market fit, 3) go-to-market, and 4) manufacturing. Financials are assessed last; if the preceding elements fail, the numbers are irrelevant.

To combat fraud, some credit funds use the prospective borrower's due diligence deposit to fund deep background checks on founders and management as the very first step. Any past financial impropriety, no matter how old, results in an immediate rejection, making recent high-profile frauds avoidable.

An expert reveals two shocking statistics: 80% of new founders fail their first diligence attempt, and 85% of early-stage investors don't perform confirmatory diligence. This highlights a massive, systemic weakness and inefficiency in the startup ecosystem, creating significant risk on both sides of the table.

The most valuable skill from scouting isn't talent evaluation, but developing a "BS detector" from interviewing hundreds of prospects. Cross-referencing claims and watching people act in their self-interest provides a powerful lesson in the human element of due diligence and the overriding power of incentives.

Beyond vetting a startup's science, investors must perform meticulous legal due diligence. A guest's firm was scammed by investing in a similarly named shell company (an LLC) instead of the legitimate firm (a limited partnership), resulting in a total loss of their investment.

In competitive funding rounds, investors may rely on the diligence of other VCs in the deal. This is a major pitfall, as founders can leverage momentum and social proof to dissuade individual scrutiny. This "diligence by proxy" enabled frauds like FTX and Theranos.

A $1M Scam Led to an Investor's Four-Part Due Diligence Framework | RiffOn