Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Signaling a potential threat to traditional SaaS, Curative canceled its Salesforce subscription after building a more effective, integrated internal CRM in just two months. This move suggests that bespoke AI-driven tools can offer superior performance and cost savings over monolithic SaaS platforms.

Related Insights

Frustration with a mediocre, AI-lacking vendor drove the decision to build a custom replacement, even when a commercial option existed. This signals a major vulnerability for incumbent SaaS players who fail to innovate with AI, as customers may choose to build rather than renew.

Enterprises no longer need to buy expensive SaaS products for tasks like customer feedback. They can now spin up custom AI agents internally, making it harder for SaaS companies to acquire new customers and leading to higher-than-modeled churn. This poses a fundamental threat to the SaaS business model.

A new trend sees AI-native companies leveraging their own AI-assisted developers ('vibe coders') to create internal software that replaces their subscriptions to commercial SaaS products. This represents a significant threat to the traditional SaaS business model, as companies opt to build rather than buy simple tools.

Companies are now rejecting expensive SaaS contracts because their internal teams can build equivalent custom solutions in days using AI coding tools. This trend signals a fundamental threat to the traditional SaaS business model, as the 'build vs. buy' calculation has dramatically shifted.

Users are leveraging AI agents to build their own bespoke software, stripping away unused features from SaaS giants like Notion. This trend toward hyper-personalization threatens the one-size-fits-all SaaS model as users create cheaper, more effective personal tools.

Small firms are using AI coding tools to build internal apps. While cost savings are significant (e.g., $40k annually), the ability to create a tailored user interface that precisely fits their workflow is a primary driver, as seen with Arcade.dev replacing HubSpot.

For decades, buying generalized SaaS was more efficient than building custom software. AI coding agents reverse this. Now, companies can build hyper-specific, more effective tools internally for less cost than a bloated SaaS subscription, because they only need to solve their unique problem.

Instead of a full "rip and replace," large companies like Sanofi are keeping systems like Salesforce as a "system of record" but are moving significant workloads (up to 80%) to custom AI agent-driven processes. This subtly undermines the value and pricing power of incumbent SaaS vendors.

Nimble small and medium-sized businesses will increasingly use AI to build custom internal tools, especially for CRM. They will opt to create the 20% of features they actually need, rather than pay for complex, expensive enterprise software where they ignore 80% of the functionality.

While Salesforce seems difficult to disrupt externally, its large Fortune 500 customers have the resources to build their own tailored solutions using AI. They can bypass paying for a bloated software suite they only partially use, posing a significant "insourcing" risk.

Curative Replaced its $600k/Year Salesforce Contract with an Internal AI Tool | RiffOn