A surprising driver for employee ownership in the U.S. is national security. Lawmakers on both sides are concerned about American companies being acquired by foreign entities, viewing employee buyouts as a bipartisan strategy to keep strategic assets under domestic control.

Related Insights

The most powerful incentive for increasing employee ownership is to make founder exits to their employees tax-free. This aligns financial self-interest with a social good, making it more profitable for a founder to sell to their team than to private equity.

A founder who hoped to one day sell his company to employees was advised to start now. Implementing an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) early aligns the team with the long-term mission, shares the burdens of entrepreneurship, and builds a sustainable, purpose-driven culture from the beginning.

Granting stock options is only half the battle. To make equity a powerful motivator, leaders must constantly communicate a clear and believable narrative for a future liquidity event, such as an acquisition. This vision is what transforms paper ownership into a tangible and valuable incentive in the minds of employees.

The U.S. is shifting from industry supporter to active owner by taking direct equity stakes in firms like Intel and U.S. Steel. This move blurs the lines between free markets and state control, risking a system where political connections, not performance, determine success.

The Dutch government took control of Chinese-owned Nexperia, a major European chipmaker, citing national security risks. This move is far more aggressive than U.S. strategies like taking minority stakes, indicating a European willingness to nationalize key tech assets to counter foreign influence in the semiconductor supply chain.

New technologies perceived as job-destroying, like AI, face significant public and regulatory risk. A powerful defense is to make the general public owners of the technology. When people have a financial stake in a technology's success, they are far more likely to defend it than fight against it.

When the U.S. government becomes a major shareholder, it can create significant challenges for a company's international operations. Foreign governments and customers may view the company with suspicion, raising concerns about data privacy, security, and its role as a potential tool of U.S. policy.

The administration justifies taking equity stakes in private industries—a form of state capitalism—by reframing the global landscape as an "economic war." The pandemic exposed critical supply chain vulnerabilities in areas like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, making domestic production a matter of national security, similar to wartime industrial mobilization.

A service company's primary asset is its people. To prevent your best talent from leaving and becoming competitors, you must give them significant equity. This transforms their mindset from employee to owner, aligning their interests with the firm's long-term success and growth.

The long-standing American political consensus favoring lower trade barriers has been replaced. Industrial policy, with active government shaping of key sectors via tariffs and investment, is now a durable, bipartisan strategy seen under both Trump and Biden administrations.