Schools ban AI like ChatGPT fearing it's a tool for cheating, but this is profoundly shortsighted. The quality of an AI's output is entirely dependent on the critical thinking behind the user's input. This makes AI the first truly scalable tool for teaching children how to think critically, a skill far more valuable than memorization.

Accepting the narrative that attention spans are shrinking is dangerous. It can lead educators and creators to give up on encouraging deep, focused tasks like reading long novels, thereby causing the very outcome they fear by lowering their expectations and standards.

Green first attempts to resolve issues with corporations like pharma companies through private channels. He finds this less confrontational and often effective. Public campaigns are a last resort when private conversations fail to produce change, a tactic other advocates can model.

To create authentic work, creators should ignore social media's immediate feedback loops, which reward outrage. Instead, write as if the only audience is your children 20 years from now. This forces fearlessness and a focus on timeless truths over transient, algorithm-pleasing trends.

Critical media narratives targeting experienced tech leaders in government aim to intimidate future experts from public service. By framing deep industry experience as an inherent conflict of interest, these stories create a vacuum filled by less-qualified academics and career politicians, ultimately harming the quality of policymaking.

When a norm is violated publicly, it threatens the common knowledge that the norm exists and is enforced. The resulting public punishment, like a digital-age pillory, isn't just about the transgressor; it's a signal to the entire community that the norm is still in effect, thereby restoring common knowledge.

A ban on a product or activity, like pickleball, can generate significant positive attention and increase consumer demand. By making something feel rebellious or forbidden, a ban creates an allure that traditional marketing can't replicate, as seen with brands like Uber and Red Bull.

In just five years, the corporate environment has swung from encouraging open discussion on social issues like race to fearing it. This "whipsaw" is driven by ideological extremes on both sides, making it difficult for leaders to find a rational middle ground for authentic engagement.

Public criticism and 'cancellation' attempts lose their power if you refuse to remove yourself from the conversation. The ultimate act of being cancelled is your own decision to stop showing up, learning, and creating. By continuing to participate and evolve, you retain control over your own platform.