By treating allies as rivals and weaponizing tech access, the Trump administration broke the old dynamic of US trade protection. This spurred Europe to pursue its own sovereign tech stack ('Eurostack') to reduce dependency.
The tariff war was not primarily about revenue but a strategic move to create an "artificial negotiating point." By imposing tariffs, the U.S. could then offer reductions in exchange for European countries committing to American technology and supply chains over China's growing, low-cost alternatives.
The Dutch government took control of Chinese-owned Nexperia, a major European chipmaker, citing national security risks. This move is far more aggressive than U.S. strategies like taking minority stakes, indicating a European willingness to nationalize key tech assets to counter foreign influence in the semiconductor supply chain.
Beyond the US-China rivalry, a new front is opening between Brussels and Beijing. Incidents like the French suspension of fashion retailer Shein are not isolated but symptomatic of growing European mistrust and a willingness to take action. This signals a potential fracturing of global trade blocs and increased regulatory risk for Chinese firms in the EU.
Actions like the Greenland affair are alienating allies like Canada and the EU. This pushes them to pursue independent, softer trade policies with China to secure economic benefits, seeing it as diversification rather than a strategic pivot away from the US.
Despite its talent, Europe struggles to scale domestic tech companies, leaving it strategically vulnerable. It's forced to depend on US cloud providers it views with suspicion or Chinese alternatives it also distrusts, with no viable third option.
With the U.S. stepping back from its traditional leadership role, European countries are creating new, direct alliances to ensure their own security. A notable example is the emerging UK-Scandinavia-Baltic-Poland axis, which signals a fundamental shift in the continent's geopolitical architecture away from a singular reliance on Washington.
Limiting chip exports to certain nations will force them to develop their own parallel hardware and software. This bifurcation creates a new global competitor and risks making the West's technology stack obsolete if the rival ecosystem becomes dominant.
The administration's aggressive, unilateral actions are pushing European nations toward strategic autonomy rather than cooperation. This alienates key partners and fundamentally undermines the 'Allied Scale' strategy of building a collective economic bloc to counter adversaries like China.
The aggressive, go-it-alone tactics of the 'America First' doctrine alienate both allies and adversaries. This pushes them to build alternative payment systems and trade alliances, speeding up the very de-dollarization and decline in U.S. influence that the strategy aims to prevent.
The conflict between Dutch chipmaker Nexperia and its Chinese parent, triggered by US sanctions, shows how European companies are becoming unintended casualties in the broader US-China geopolitical struggle, extending the tech war's impact beyond the two primary nations.