Regulation E mandates that if a bank denies a fraud claim, it must provide a written explanation and supporting documents. This procedural rule is a powerful tool for consumer advocates, effectively forcing the bank's own staff to build the case file for consumers who lack their own records.
Related Insights
The chargeback mechanism adjudicates over 100 million consumer-business disputes annually, far more than the formal US legal system. It operates as a privately funded, bank-run judiciary with its own rules and low costs, forming an essential foundation of modern e-commerce.
Instead of focusing on past abuses, financial regulation should proactively define simple, safe, and easy-to-compare products. Requiring all firms to offer these standardized 'starter kit' options would foster genuine price competition and empower consumers.
Identifying unauthorized sellers on platforms like Amazon is the easy part. Getting them removed requires building a massive, forensic-level data file that documents every instance of violation. This court-ready evidence is necessary to compel platforms to take action against bad actors.
Regulation E, a 1979 law, legally mandates that financial institutions bear liability for unauthorized electronic fund transfers. This forces banks to create robust, consumer-friendly dispute systems like chargebacks, making them appear responsive when they are simply complying with strict federal rules that protect consumers.
Unlike other tech verticals, fintech platforms cannot claim neutrality and abdicate responsibility for risk. Providing robust consumer protections, like the chargeback process for credit cards, is essential for building the user trust required for mass adoption. Without that trust, there is no incentive for consumers to use the product.
Unlike profitable credit cards, Zelle is a low-monetization service banks created to compete with fintech apps. Because it can't afford the fraud costs mandated by Regulation E, banks attempt to argue that customer-authorized (but fraudulent) transfers aren't their responsibility, creating a major policy conflict.
Regulatory capture is not an abstract problem. It has tangible negative consequences for everyday consumers, such as the elimination of free checking accounts after the Dodd-Frank Act was passed, or rules preventing physicians from opening new hospitals, which stifles competition and drives up costs.
Unlike debit cards protected by Regulation E, gift cards are intentionally exempted from strong consumer protection laws. This carve-out, lobbied for by retailers to ease commerce, removes the legal requirement for financial institutions to investigate fraud and reimburse victims, shifting the entire loss to the consumer.
Purely model-based or rule-based systems have flaws. Stripe combines them for better results. For instance, a transaction with a CVC code mismatch (a rule) is only blocked if its model-generated risk score is also elevated, preventing rejection of good customers who make simple mistakes.
After Citibank accidentally sent $900 million to Revlon's lenders, a new clause called the "erroneous payment deal term" emerged. This term is now in 90% of credit deals, illustrating how a single, high-profile operational failure can rapidly create a new, non-negotiable market standard for risk mitigation.
