In times of crisis, expecting an opposition party to lead the charge is a mistake. Real political movements are initiated by citizens who set the moral terms and take risks. The political party then becomes just one part of a larger coalition that it doesn't necessarily lead.

To become more than the sum of their parts, fragmented activist groups need an umbrella formation. Historical examples like South Africa's United Democratic Front and similar alliances in Chile and South Korea show how a coordinating body can give strategic shape and greater power to a broad-based democracy movement.

The various factions united under Trump lack a cohesive ideology. Their single common thread is opposition to progressivism. When that external threat recedes, their internal disagreements, such as on foreign interventionism, cause the coalition to fracture.

Despite differing systems—communism in China, nationalism in Russia, theocracy in Iran—modern authoritarian regimes form alliances based on a common enemy. Their unifying principle is a shared dislike and fear of liberal democratic values like the rule of law and individual rights.

To build a broad coalition, focus on anti-corruption. This narrative transcends political ideologies by framing the issue as the tangible theft of citizens' money and rights, resonating more widely than abstract political arguments.

The goal of nonviolent resistance is not to "melt the heart of the dictator" but to strategically create defections within their pillars of support. By growing large and diverse, a movement builds direct ties to elites in business, media, and security, systematically shredding their loyalty to the regime.

Dictatorships can tolerate individual criticism but actively suppress mechanisms that create common knowledge, like public assemblies or organized online groups. They understand that power rests on preventing citizens from realizing that their grievances are shared. Once dissent becomes common knowledge, coordinated revolt is possible, which no regime can withstand.

Jane Fonda argues that defeating an authoritarian regime requires weakening its "pillars of support" like finance, military, and art. This is achieved through strategic noncompliance—strikes, boycotts, and mass actions that hit the economy—rather than traditional protests, which are less effective against entrenched power.

In a populist era, political objectives are increasingly defined by simply stopping the rival party rather than advancing a specific vision. This "negative partisanship" leads to proposals designed to neutralize the opposition's power, not solve national problems.