The impending halt of the Fed's balance sheet reduction (QT) is not a reaction to a major economic crisis, but a technical necessity to prevent stress in short-term funding markets as bank reserves become scarce. The Fed is preemptively avoiding a 2019-style repo spike, signaling a quiet return to mild balance sheet expansion.
Related Insights
After a decade of zero rates and QE post-2008, the financial system can no longer function without continuous stimulus. Attempts to tighten policy, as seen with the 2018 repo crisis, immediately cause breakdowns, forcing central banks to reverse course and indicating a permanent state of intervention.
The recent uptick in the Fed funds rate was not a direct signal of scarce bank reserves. Instead, it was driven by its primary lenders, Federal Home Loan Banks, shifting their cash to the higher-yielding repo market. This supply-side shift forced borrowers in the Fed funds market to pay more.
The Fed has a clear hierarchy for managing liquidity post-QT. It will first adjust administered rates like the Standing Repo Facility (SRF) rate and use temporary open market operations (TOMOs) for short-term needs. Direct T-bill purchases are a more distant tool, reserved for 2026, as the system is not yet at 'reserve scarcity'.
J.P. Morgan believes the Fed's balance sheet runoff can continue until at least Q1 2026, and potentially longer. The financial system's ability to smoothly handle recent funding stress points (like corporate tax day) suggests that reserves are still abundant enough to support a prolonged QT timeline.
Unlike September 2019, the recent corporate tax day saw no funding crisis. The mere existence of the Fed's Standing Repo Facility (SRF) calmed markets, preventing panic. This psychological backstop, combined with higher bank reserves and a better regulatory environment, proved crucial for stability.
Recent spikes in repo rates show funding markets are now highly sensitive to new collateral. The dwindling overnight Reverse Repo (RRP) facility, once a key buffer, is no longer absorbing shocks, indicating liquidity has tightened significantly and Quantitative Tightening (QT) has reached its practical limit.
The Federal Reserve’s recent policy shift is not a full-blown move to an expansionary stance. It's a 'recalibration' away from a restrictive policy focused solely on inflation toward a more neutral one that equally weighs the risks to both inflation and the labor market.
Over the past few years, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve have been working at cross-purposes. While the Fed attempted to remove liquidity from the system via quantitative tightening, the Treasury effectively reinjected it by drawing down its reverse repo facility and focusing issuance on T-bills.
The early end to the Fed's Quantitative Tightening (QT) is largely irrelevant for year-end funding pressures. The monthly $20 billion runoff is insignificant compared to daily swings in Treasury balances or money market funds. The primary drivers remain bank balance sheet constraints and regulatory hurdles.
The Federal Reserve’s decision to end Quantitative Tightening (QT) is heavily influenced by a desire to avoid a repeat of the 2019 funding crisis. The 'political economy' of the decision is key, as the Fed aims to prevent giving critics 'ammunition' by demonstrating it can control short-term rates.