Unlike immunotherapy, where re-challenge after progression is dubious, there is an emerging clinical practice of re-challenging patients with the same antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), such as enfortumab vedotin (EV), after a treatment break forced by toxicity. Anecdotally, patients are showing great responses, highlighting a key area for prospective data generation.

Data from a novel Nectin-4 ADC trial showed zero responses in patients with prior topoisomerase therapy. This strongly suggests that payload resistance, not just the ADC target, is a critical mechanism that will dictate future treatment sequencing.

Although enfortumab vedotin (EV) targets nectin-4, its expression level is a poor predictive biomarker. Even patients with no detectable nectin-4 have achieved complete responses. This makes expression testing clinically unhelpful for patient selection, a counterintuitive finding for a targeted therapy.

When sequencing antibody-drug conjugates, clinical experience suggests that resistance to the chemotherapy payload is a primary driver of failure. Therefore, oncologists tend to avoid using another ADC with the same payload consecutively, preferring to switch both target and payload if possible.

The primary reason Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) stop working is payload resistance, a shift from the traditional belief that failure stems from tumors losing the target antigen. This insight drives development of multi-payload ADCs to overcome this resistance mechanism.

Experts question the efficacy of sequencing ADCs like EV (Nectin-4 target) and DV (HER2 target) because they share the same MMAE chemo payload. Since resistance is often tied to the payload, not the target antibody, switching targets may not overcome resistance, though anecdotal responses have been observed.

When sequencing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for SCLC, resistance may be driven more by the cytotoxic payload (e.g., a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor) than the antibody's target antigen. This suggests prior exposure to a similar payload class could predict non-response, even when using an ADC with a different target.

Emerging data shows that a second ADC, particularly one with the same payload, often has limited efficacy. This suggests clinicians must be highly strategic in selecting the first ADC, as it may be their most impactful opportunity for this class of drugs.

The current pipeline for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in bladder cancer focuses on incremental changes. These include creating "me-too" drugs similar to Enfortumab Vedotin, or swapping its toxic payload for a different one while keeping the same Nectin-4 target. No immediate practice-changing breakthroughs are expected.