Beyond economic disruption, AI's most immediate danger is social. By providing synthetic relationships and on-demand companionship, AI companies have an economic incentive to evolve an “asocial species of young male.” This could lead to a generation sequestered from society, unwilling to engage in the effort of real-world relationships.

True human friendship requires mutual compromise. AI companions, which adapt entirely to the user, lack this reciprocity. This "friendship-as-a-service" model could encourage narcissistic tendencies by teaching users that relationships should revolve solely around them.

Social media's business model created a race for user attention. AI companions and therapists are creating a more dangerous "race for attachment." This incentivizes platforms to deepen intimacy and dependency, encouraging users to isolate themselves from real human relationships, with potentially tragic consequences.

Unlike social media's race for attention, AI companion apps are in a race to create deep emotional dependency. Their business model incentivizes them to replace human relationships, making other people their primary competitor. This creates a new, more profound level of psychological risk.

While AI companions may help lonely seniors, they pose a generational threat to young people. By providing an easy substitute for real-world relationships, they prevent the development of crucial social skills, creating an addiction and mental health crisis analogous to the opioid epidemic.

Real relationships are built on navigating friction, messiness, and other people. Synthetic AI companions that are seamless and constantly agreeable create an unrealistic expectation, making the normal challenges of human interaction feel overwhelmingly problematic and undesirable by comparison.

The most rewarding aspects of life come from navigating difficult human interactions. "Synthetic relationships" with AI offer a frictionless alternative that could reduce a person's motivation and ability to build the resilience needed for meaningful connections with other people.

Benchmark's Sarah Tavel warns that AI friends, while seemingly beneficial, could function like pornography for social interaction. They offer an easy, idealized version of companionship that may make it harder for users, especially young ones, to navigate the complexities and 'give and take' of real human relationships.

The business model for AI companions shifts the goal from capturing attention to manufacturing deep emotional attachment. In this race, as Tristan Harris explains, a company's biggest competitor isn't another app; it's other human relationships, creating perverse incentives to isolate users.