Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The ubiquitous awareness-consideration-conversion funnel originated as a script for door-to-door salespeople in the 1920s. Digital platforms revived it simply to categorize and sell their complex ad inventories, not because it reflects actual consumer behavior.

Related Insights

Jon Miller, who helped popularize the MQL, now compares its linear funnel to the geocentric model of the solar system. He argues it was a once-useful simplification that no longer reflects the complex, nonlinear reality of B2B buying, as it ignores the most important, untrackable parts of the journey.

A critical insight from Refine Labs is that what marketers call a "funnel" isn't a map of customer behavior, but a framework for an internal sales process. This common misinterpretation leads marketing teams to incorrectly believe they are modeling the buyer's journey when they are merely tracking their own operational stages.

The marketing funnel's resilience isn't just inertia. It's systemically reinforced from both ends of a marketer's career. Universities teach it as a foundational concept, and leadership (CEOs, boards) demands its simplicity for reporting, leaving practitioners in the middle unable to drive change without significant career risk.

With buyers completing nearly 80% of their research using tools like Generative AI before vendor contact, the linear funnel is dead. Traditional metrics like MQLs and SQLs are meaningless. Go-to-market strategies must be rewritten to influence buyers during their independent, non-linear discovery phase.

Traditional funnels miss the nuance of individual buying journeys. Conviva's CEO argues for analyzing personal behavior patterns—like a "research shopper" toggling between cart and reviews—to understand user intent and boost conversion, rather than forcing users into a predefined sequence.

The marketing funnel survives not because it's accurate, but because it's a memorable piece of "intellectual property." In a world of information overload, the human brain gravitates towards simple, easy-to-understand concepts. The lack of widely accepted, equally simple alternatives in B2B marketing ensures the funnel's continued dominance.

Academics defend the funnel as an aggregate snapshot of a market's proximity to purchase, not a literal customer path. However, this theoretical definition is irrelevant because practitioners use it as a linear tool for micro-optimizations (e.g., MQL to SQL conversion), which is precisely why it fails to reflect the non-linear reality of modern buying.

The old funnel model assumes a linear path, but customers interact across channels constantly. This model shows what happened (e.g., a click) but misses the underlying intent and what the customer actually needs in that moment, providing a flawed view of the journey.

In subscription or repeat-purchase businesses, the customer relationship begins at the point of sale, it doesn't end. The funnel metaphor is limiting because it ignores the crucial post-acquisition phases of adoption, expansion, and loyalty, where most value is created.

While product teams design simple 6-7 step funnels, data from Conviva reveals that the average real-world e-commerce buying journey involves over 50 steps, sometimes even 150. This starkly illustrates how much user behavior and intent is lost in traditional, oversimplified analytics models.