Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Contrary to the 'all-in' startup mantra, Mario Schlosser initially dedicated only 20% of his time to Oscar Health. This approach allowed him to explore the idea without immense pressure, letting it develop organically before he fully committed, demonstrating that a venture doesn't need 100% focus from day one to succeed.

Related Insights

Before quitting her job, Jessie Inchauspé committed to working on her Instagram account for one hour every day for six months. This low-risk approach allowed her to gather data and audience feedback, validating the concept's potential before going all-in.

When facing major life changes like a new child or a demanding job, the solution isn't to "hustle harder." Instead, successful founders intentionally pause large, demanding projects (like a new SaaS) and switch to smaller, "step one" businesses or maintenance mode. This preserves momentum without causing burnout.

Conventional wisdom to 'stay focused' is flawed. Breakthrough growth often comes from making many small, exploratory bets. YipitData's success wasn't from perfecting one thing, but from the one small, tangential bet each year that drove 90% of the growth while others failed.

Conventional wisdom that early-stage startups must "grind" is flawed. The primary constraint is a lack of unique insight to find product-market fit, not a lack of hours worked. A relentless "996" culture can be counterproductive, as it leaves no room for the deep thinking and creativity needed for breakthrough ideas.

Monologue creator Naveen Nadeau arranged to work three days a week at his old job while exploring new ideas. This provided financial stability and runway, allowing him to experiment with less pressure before committing full-time to his own venture.

Founder Nima Jalali describes the first five years as an all-consuming period with no work-life boundaries. He frames this intense sprint not as a sustainable strategy, but as a necessary, finite phase to build a foundation that later allows for hiring a team and establishing balance.

Conventional advice about work-life balance to avoid burnout is counterproductive for founders with extreme ambitions. Building a massive, venture-scale company requires a level of obsessive focus and sacrifice that is inherently unbalanced. For this specific phase of life, prioritizing the company above all else is necessary for success.

Before officially starting, founders are in a '-1 to 0' phase. Instead of rushing, they should take months or even a year to find a core purpose they can commit to for a decade. This deep conviction provides immense peace, prevents reactive pivots, and sets a stable foundation for the long term.

The dominant VC narrative demands founders focus on a single venture. However, successful entrepreneurs demonstrate that running multiple projects—a portfolio approach mirrored by VCs themselves—is a viable path, contrary to the "focus on one thing" dogma.

Instead of all founders jumping into the venture simultaneously, one can go full-time while others maintain their jobs and provide support. This staggered approach mitigates personal financial risk for the team as the business scales to support more salaries.

Oscar Health's Founder Validated His $4BN Idea by Initially Committing Only 20% of His Time | RiffOn