There's a growing recognition that the molecular profile of a primary tumor can differ significantly from its metastases. To guide treatment more accurately, the preferred practice is to biopsy an accessible metastatic lesion when possible, as this better reflects the biology of the active disease being treated.

True early cancer detection involves finding microscopic tumor DNA in blood samples. This can identify cancer years before it's visible on an MRI, creating an opportunity for a patient's own immune system to potentially eliminate it before it ever becomes a clinical disease.

Contrary to trends in wellness, a full-body MRI doesn't catch cancer early. A mass visible on an MRI already contains billions of cells and may have spread. Furthermore, it often leads to a rabbit hole of invasive tests for benign abnormalities, causing unnecessary harm.

Plasmacytoid bladder cancer spreads locally along the urothelium, which can be missed on imaging. Clinicians must push for a thorough examination under anesthesia (EUA) before surgery, even if a patient shows a complete radiographic response to therapy.

The patient population in pivotal trials like EMBARK, defined as non-metastatic by conventional imaging, is being re-evaluated. A UCLA study showed that over 80% of a similar patient group would have been positive on a PSMA PET scan, suggesting the "M0" classification is largely an artifact of older imaging technology and that these patients likely have micrometastatic disease.

There is a growing suspicion that conventional imaging understages many presumed early-stage lobular cancers. Using FES PET-CT upfront could detect small-volume metastatic disease missed by other methods. This would reclassify patients to a metastatic setting, sparing them the morbidity of major local surgeries that would not be curative.

Cervical cancer is one of the few malignancies where clinical staging via physical examination remains paramount. Advanced imaging like MRI or PET scans can sometimes overestimate the extent of the disease, making a hands-on clinical exam essential for accurate staging and treatment planning.

While powerful, FES PET-CT is a specialized tool with key limitations. It is not effective for evaluating disease in the liver, a common site of breast cancer metastasis. Furthermore, it cannot detect any disease that has become estrogen receptor-negative. Therefore, it must be used as part of a broader imaging program, not as a standalone surveillance tool.

When a sentinel lymph node biopsy is skipped, radiation oncologists lack crucial staging information. This can make them hesitant to recommend less-invasive partial breast radiation, even if a patient otherwise qualifies. They may instead recommend whole breast radiation to treat any potential, unconfirmed microscopic disease in the axilla.