The patient population in pivotal trials like EMBARK, defined as non-metastatic by conventional imaging, is being re-evaluated. A UCLA study showed that over 80% of a similar patient group would have been positive on a PSMA PET scan, suggesting the "M0" classification is largely an artifact of older imaging technology and that these patients likely have micrometastatic disease.
Related Insights
Standard guidelines for treating metastatic prostate cancer are based on conventional imaging (CT/bone scan). The panel argues that PSMA PET-positive biochemical recurrence represents a different, earlier disease state. This necessitates new treatment paradigms, like definitive therapy durations, not covered by current guidelines.
The advent of highly sensitive PSMA PET imaging identifies metastases in many patients previously considered to have only biochemical relapse (BCR). However, experts argue against a knee-jerk reaction to treat. Many of these patients, particularly those with slow PSA doubling times, can be safely observed, challenging the assumption that visible disease always requires immediate intervention.
An NCI working group coined "PSMA positive BCR" to classify patients with biochemical relapse (BCR) who have findings on a modern PSMA PET scan. This formally recognizes this group is distinct from both conventionally-defined metastatic patients and traditional BCR patients, necessitating unique clinical trial designs and treatment strategies.
Data from the CAPItello trial showed a significant number of patients with PTEN deficiency experienced radiological progression without a corresponding PSA increase. This challenges the standard reliance on PSA for monitoring in high-risk prostate cancer and suggests a need for more frequent, personalized imaging protocols to detect progression earlier.
For patients with conventionally negative imaging but positive PSMA PET scans (oligometastatic disease), continuous intensified therapy may be overtreatment. A new paradigm involves metastasis-directed therapy followed by a short course of escalated treatment, then stopping to observe. This "time-limited" approach balances efficacy with reducing long-term treatment burden.
NCCN now recommends PSMA PET as a potential replacement for traditional CT, MRI, and bone scans for initial staging of higher-risk prostate cancer and detecting recurrence. This shift is based on PSMA PET's superior sensitivity and specificity for finding micrometastatic disease, positioning it as a more effective frontline tool.
Landmark clinical trials (CONDOR, SPOTlight) demonstrate that PSMA PET imaging effectively identifies recurrent prostate cancer in a high percentage of patients even with very low PSA levels. This challenges the traditional paradigm of waiting for higher PSA thresholds before imaging, enabling earlier and more precise intervention.
The EMBARK trial demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit, yet experts argue this doesn't automatically make treatment mandatory. For asymptomatic patients with a long life expectancy, factors like treatment-free survival and quality of life are critical considerations, challenging the primacy of OS as the sole decision-driver in this population.
Even if most of a patient's cancer is PSMA-avid, the presence of small liver lesions that are *not* PSMA-avid is a major red flag. This can indicate a more aggressive, PSMA-negative biology that won't respond to PSMA-targeted therapy and may instead require alternative treatments like chemotherapy, complicating patient selection.
A critical limitation of PSMA PET is its inability to detect tumors that do not express the PSMA protein. In these cases, a patient may show extensive disease on a conventional bone scan that is entirely invisible on a PSMA PET scan, highlighting the risk of relying on a single imaging modality.