The negative ANSA-RAD trial, when contrasted with the positive STAMPEDE trial, demonstrates that patient selection is paramount in adjuvant therapy. The difference in outcomes was driven by risk definition, not the drug. This reinforces that "negative" trials are clinically vital for defining which patient populations do not benefit, preventing widespread overtreatment.

Following high response rates to systemic therapies like EV Pembro, using radiation for bladder preservation is now questioned. It may constitute overtreatment by radiating a now cancer-free organ, while providing no benefit for the systemic micrometastases that are the primary driver of mortality.

Clinicians are concerned about the overuse of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for oligoprogressive disease, a practice dubbed 'Pokemon' (gotta catch 'em all). This approach of sequentially radiating new lesions can delay the start of more effective systemic therapies and is not considered a standard of care.

In the absence of direct evidence for adjuvant therapy in high-risk, non-clear cell kidney cancers, clinicians may justify off-label treatment by extrapolating from the drug's known efficacy in the metastatic setting for that specific histology. This highlights the difficult risk-benefit calculations made daily in data-poor clinical scenarios.

While cosmetic results are a significant consideration in modern breast surgery, the primary, non-negotiable goal is eradicating the cancer to prevent recurrence. Surgeons emphasize that aesthetic goals, while a 'very close second,' must not compromise the thoroughness of the cancer treatment, a crucial distinction for patients and providers.

While primarily known for guiding radiation, surgeons place clips in the lumpectomy cavity for their own future reference. These markers are critical for guiding re-excision if margins are positive and help radiologists accurately monitor the surgical site for recurrence on future mammograms, distinguishing scar tissue from new concerns.

Modern breast cancer treatment has shifted from a 'one-size-fits-all' aggressive approach to a highly individualized one. By de-escalating care—doing smaller surgeries, minimizing radiation, and sometimes omitting chemotherapy or lymph node biopsies—clinicians can achieve better outcomes with fewer long-term complications for patients with favorable disease characteristics.

While a positive ctDNA test clearly signals the need for adjuvant therapy, a negative result is less actionable for deciding initial treatment. The key prognostic value comes from being *serially* undetectable over time, information that is not available when the immediate post-surgery treatment decision must be made.

Experts are divided on the optimal strategy for CT-DNA negative patients post-surgery. One side advocates for monitoring to spare patients from unnecessary treatment toxicity, while the other questions if this delay is non-inferior to immediate adjuvant therapy, a critical question not yet answered by trials.