With information now ubiquitous, the primary source of market inefficiency is no longer informational but behavioral. The most durable edge is "time arbitrage"—exploiting the market's obsession with short-term results by focusing on a business's normalized potential over a two-to-four-year horizon.

While competitors retrench during recessions, Amphenol leverages its strong balance sheet to accelerate M&A. This counter-cyclical strategy allows it to acquire strategic assets at attractive valuations, ensuring it emerges from downturns with increased market share and strength.

Public serial acquirers like Constellation Software exploit a valuation arbitrage. They buy private niche businesses at low multiples (e.g., 5x EBITDA) which are then automatically revalued at the parent company's much higher public market multiple (e.g., 28x EBITDA), creating significant shareholder value on day one.

Companies that grow via frequent acquisitions often exclude integration costs from adjusted metrics by labeling them "one-time" charges. This is misleading. For this business model, these are predictable, recurring operational expenses and should be treated as such by analysts calculating a company's true profitability.

Large media companies are slow to adopt new platforms like Substack. However, once one major player makes a move (e.g., Bloomberg launching Substacks), it triggers a "fast follow" reaction from competitors. This predictable herd mentality creates strategic windows for creators on those platforms to pursue acquisitions.

A powerful EM strategy involves identifying businesses with proven, powerful models from developed markets, like American Tower. Local EM investor bases may not be familiar with the model's potential, creating an opportunity to buy these companies at a displaced valuation before their predictable results drive multiple expansion.

The most lucrative exit for a startup is often not an IPO, but an M&A deal within an oligopolistic industry. When 3-4 major players exist, they can be forced into an irrational bidding war driven by the fear of a competitor acquiring the asset, leading to outcomes that are even better than going public.

Financial models struggle to project sustained high growth rates (>30% YoY). Analysts naturally revert to the mean, causing them to undervalue companies that defy this and maintain high growth for years, creating an opportunity for investors who spot this persistence.

Investors instinctively value the distant future cash flows of elite compounding businesses higher than traditional financial models suggest. This phenomenon, known as hyperbolic discounting, helps explain why these companies consistently command premium multiples, as the market behaves more aligned with this model than standard exponential discounting.