Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Hiring documents often swing between demanding a "product unicorn" with an impossible mix of skills and a watered-down description so vague it attracts completely unqualified applicants. Both extremes fail to define the role effectively and create noise in the hiring process.

Related Insights

Difficulty in the design job market stems not from increased competition, but from companies seeking a perfect "puzzle piece" fit. They are over-filtering for extremely narrow, rigid profiles, often rejecting highly qualified but non-matching candidates.

Hiring managers often create AI-specific roles thinking it attracts experts. Instead, they should frame job descriptions around the complex problems the business needs to solve. This attracts true problem-solvers who can learn any necessary technology, rather than individuals skilled at keyword optimization.

An effective job description acts as a sales pitch that disqualifies the wrong candidates. Using provocative and ambiguous phrases like "ideological minority at a top 10 school" serves as an inherent confidence test, deeply resonating with the right people while filtering out others.

Companies create impossible job descriptions seeking perfect candidates ('purple squirrels') who have already done the exact job. A better strategy is to identify high-aptitude individuals ('brown squirrels') from undervalued talent pools and invest in training them to fill specific needs, bridging the gap between academia and industry.

A common scaling mistake is continuing to hire for broad, 'multi-hyphen' roles (e.g., 'sales and retail manager'). As the business grows, these generalist positions dilute focus. Instead, create tighter, more specialized job descriptions to bring clarity and attract hyper-focused candidates.

Founders fail at hiring because they try to replace themselves with a single person who can do everything—a unicorn that doesn't exist. Instead, break down the role into its core functions (e.g., the horn, the horse, the sparkle) and hire multiple, more easily-found specialists to fulfill those distinct needs.

Before writing a job description, create an in-depth scorecard with three components: the role's Mission (its purpose), key Outcomes (measurable results), and Competencies (functional and cultural skills). This forces alignment among stakeholders and clarifies what success looks like before the first interview.

Traditional, long job descriptions create ambiguity. Distilling a role down to the three most critical, non-negotiable tasks clarifies expectations and prevents employees from justifying poor performance in key areas with success in minor ones.

In a fast-moving environment, rigid job descriptions are a hindrance. Instead of hiring for a specific role, recruit versatile "athletes" with high general aptitude. A single great person can fluidly move between delivery, sales, and product leadership, making them far more valuable than a specialist.

Job descriptions are written to attract candidates, not to guide daily decision-making. Relying on them for operational clarity creates a gap between what's on paper and who actually decides, leading to career-killing confusion. They are the wrong artifact for clarifying real-time roles and responsibilities.