Sam Altman counters Anthropic's ads by reframing the debate. He positions OpenAI as a champion for broad, free access for the masses ("billions of people who can't pay"), while painting Anthropic as an elitist service for the wealthy ("serves an expensive product to rich people"), shifting the narrative from ad ethics to accessibility.

When you're the market leader, the strongest response to a competitor's jab is indifference, like Don Draper's "I don't think about you at all." OpenAI's lengthy, serious rebuttal to Anthropic's ad amplified the attack and made them look defensive, which is the opposite of how a dominant player should behave.

Sam Altman's detailed, serious response to Anthropic's humorous ad was a tactical error. The "authoritarian" accusation made OpenAI seem defensive and humorless, giving Anthropic's critique more credibility and airtime. A simple, witty retort or ignoring it would have been more effective.

Anthropic’s ads never mention OpenAI or ChatGPT. By attacking the generic concept of “ads in AI,” they can target the market leader by default. This highlights a vulnerability for dominant players, where any critique of the category lands as a direct hit on them, a so-called "champagne problem."

A direct competitive attack, like Anthropic's jab at OpenAI, can succeed before the campaign officially launches. The victory is sealed when your competitor's executives publicly comment, confirming you've struck a nerve and won the initial attention war.

The conflict between AI labs has moved beyond a 'cold war' of poaching talent to a public battle for perception. Anthropic’s ads represent a 'gloves off' moment, using what the hosts call 'fear-mongering' and 'propaganda' to directly attack a competitor's business model on a massive stage like the Super Bowl.

Anthropic's ads lack a call-to-action, indicating their primary goal isn't consumer downloads. Instead, they use fear-mongering to "muddy the water" around OpenAI's upcoming ad product, aiming to make enterprise decision-makers and regulators wary of ad-supported AI models before they launch.

Anthropic's campaign risks poisoning the well for all consumer AI assistants by stoking fear about ad integration. This high-risk strategy accepts potential damage to its own brand and the category in order to inflict greater harm on the market leader, OpenAI.

Anthropic's ads imply OpenAI's upcoming ad integration will compromise AI responses with biased, low-quality suggestions. This is a "dirty" but effective tactic, creating fear and doubt about a competitor's product by attacking the category leader without naming them.