A founder-centric startup studio model, where operators get significant equity in each venture, creates silos and hinders cross-selling. A more effective model is for the parent entity to own 100% of each incubated company, with leadership hired at the top level to manage the portfolio, enabling a unified customer strategy.
Related Insights
Railsware operates as a hybrid 'product studio,' using its consultancy arm to fund and staff the creation of its own SaaS products. This model allows it to successfully build and scale multiple, distinct companies like Mailtrap (email tools) and Coupler.io (data analytics) in parallel, despite the model often confusing traditional investors.
A founder is never truly without a boss. If not shareholders or a board, the customers ultimately dictate the company's direction and success. This mindset ensures a customer-centric approach regardless of ownership structure, keeping the business grounded and responsive to market needs.
The independent sponsor model excels in the lower middle market by transforming founder-led businesses. Core value is created not just by growth, but by building out management teams and systems to de-risk the company, enabling it to be sold at a higher multiple.
The key to effective portfolio entrepreneurship isn't random diversification. It's about serving the same customer segment across multiple products. This creates a cohesive ecosystem where each new offering benefits from compounding knowledge and trust, making many things feel like one thing.
The dominant VC narrative demands founders focus on a single venture. However, successful entrepreneurs demonstrate that running multiple projects—a portfolio approach mirrored by VCs themselves—is a viable path, contrary to the "focus on one thing" dogma.
Don't expect the parent company's sales force to sell your nascent product. Their focus on core business means they will ignore emerging tech. An internal incubator must have its own dedicated go-to-market team to find new personas and develop sales plays before a handoff.
To launch new products and compete with agile startups, embed a small "incubation seller" team directly within the technology organization. This model ensures tight alignment between product, engineering, and the first revenue-generating efforts, mirroring the cross-functional approach of an early-stage company.
To overcome fierce competition in seed rounds, Offline Ventures allocates 20% of its fund to an internal studio. This capital pays for incubating ideas, which, if successful, result in the fund owning ~33% of the company, compared to the typical ~10% from a standard investment.
An internal incubator’s biggest mistake is acting like an external startup. Finding product-market fit is insufficient. Lasting success requires achieving "product-company fit" by deeply understanding and aligning with the parent company's internal business units, strategic goals, and unique challenges.
Granting a full co-founder 50% equity is a massive, often regrettable, early decision. A better model is to bring on a 'partner' with a smaller, vested equity stake (e.g., 10%). This provides accountability and complementary skills without sacrificing majority ownership and control.
