The feeling of being over-scheduled is a symptom of running ineffective meetings with no clear purpose. These bad meetings create new problems that then spawn more meetings to fix them, creating a vicious cycle of wasted time. The solution is better meetings, not fewer.

Before scheduling, ensure a meeting's purpose is to Decide, Debate, Discuss, or Develop (4Ds). Then, confirm the topic is either Complex, Emotionally intense, or a One-way door decision (CEO). This rigorous filter eliminates status updates and other low-value synchronous gatherings from calendars.

Before attending a meeting, ask two questions: 1) "What specific decision or alignment will this create?" and 2) "What happens if we don't have this meeting?" If you can't provide clear, impactful answers, the meeting is a waste of time and should be canceled or handled asynchronously.

Meetings serve as a microcosm of your company's effectiveness. If they are repetitive, lack new ideas, and don't result in action, it signals a systemic inability to innovate. Fixing the way your team approaches meetings can create a powerful ripple effect across the organization.

Meetings are a poor form of communication that create calendar clutter and force rushed decisions. Defaulting to asynchronous tools like Loom videos and email allows for better, more considered responses, protects time for deep work, and increases overall iteration speed and decision quality.

The first step to better meetings is asking "should we have this meeting at all?" By eliminating purely informational meetings, you prevent the formation of norms like disengagement and silence. This makes it more likely that when a collaborative meeting is necessary, team members will actively participate.

Dysfunctional meetings are often a symptom, not the root problem. When clear communication channels are lacking, employees default to meetings because they are highly visible, creating a performance of productivity, and they effectively hijack others' attention, making them a blunt tool for getting noticed.

Adopt the private equity board meeting model: circulate a detailed brief a week in advance. This forces attendees to consume updates asynchronously. The meeting itself can then be dedicated entirely to debating critical, forward-looking decisions instead of wasting time on status reports.

Instead of using meetings for context-setting, Loom’s team sends a required 'pre-watch' video walkthrough of the strategy. This forces stakeholders to arrive with full context, allowing the live meeting to be shorter and entirely focused on critique, asking clarifying questions, and making decisions.