Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Biographers risk doing their subjects a disservice when imposing their own academic tone onto gritty life stories. Ed William found that his initial drafts failed because he forced a cerebral online essay style onto a profane, relentless subject, requiring him to adapt directly to the subject's vernacular.

Related Insights

Don't wait to 'find' your voice. Voice is not a mystical quality but a combination of tangible, controllable elements: word choice (e.g., 'cool' vs. 'exquisite'), sentence length, and structure. By making conscious choices about these elements, you actively construct your voice.

Traditional biographies often sprawl across hundreds of pages of slow exposition, alienating modern readers. William adopted Steven Spielberg's filmmaking philosophy of omitting mundane stretches and pacing a biography like Mad Max, crafting a 200-page fast-moving narrative focused strictly on high-velocity human drama.

Biographical subjects often curate their public image by offering friendly interview contacts, yielding shallow hagiographies. David offered his biographer an interview list that intentionally included people who disliked him, establishing immediate candor and exposing authentic flaws that make narrative subjects relatable.

Amy Porterfield dictates her personal stories to ChatGPT, then prompts it to extract the key parts into a concise draft. This uses AI as a partner for clarity and structure while preserving her authentic voice, avoiding soulless, AI-generated content.

AI models fail at great literary writing because they lack an authentic "voice." This voice isn't just a stylistic quirk; it's the product of an individual's unique life experiences and perspective. Since AI lacks this grounding, its writing feels inauthentic, like an imitation of a style without the substance behind it.

Creators often make the mistake of watering down content to make stories palatable to everyone. True audience relatability comes from detailing specific problems, obstacles, and burdens rather than stripping out nuance into generic advice.

The author argues against sanitizing personal stories. Including painful truths about his family made the book more powerful because readers can sense dishonesty. Portraying people with complexity is essential for authentic storytelling.

A coherent picture of a person is built from heterogeneous, often contradictory, elements. Readers find this more convincing because it mirrors real life; everyone we know is contradictory. Instead of forcing a simple narrative, revealing inconsistencies makes a character feel more authentic and human.

Potential speakers often hesitate, feeling they lack the charisma or style of famous presenters. However, authenticity is more effective. Your unique way of structuring thoughts and telling stories will connect genuinely with an audience, whereas trying to adopt a persona will likely fail.

To write authentically for someone else, you must go beyond mimicking their language and stylistic quirks. The key is to understand their fundamental worldview—how they see the world and their core beliefs. This deeper understanding is what prevents the writing from feeling inauthentic.