In the previous SaaS era, emulating giants like Salesforce was a common but flawed strategy for startups. In the new AI era, there is no playbook at all, forcing founders to rethink go-to-market strategies from first principles rather than copying incumbents.
Related Insights
Unlike cloud or mobile, which incumbents initially ignored, AI adoption is consensus. Startups can't rely on incumbents being slow. The new 'white space' for disruption exists in niche markets large companies still deem too small to enter.
As startups build on commoditized AI platforms like GPT, product differentiation becomes less of a moat. Success now hinges on cracking growth faster than rivals. The new competitive advantages are proprietary data for training models and the deep domain expertise required to find unique growth levers.
Unlike traditional software development, AI-native founders avoid long-term, deterministic roadmaps. They recognize that AI capabilities change so rapidly that the most effective strategy is to maximize what's possible *now* with fast iteration cycles, rather than planning for a speculative future.
Incumbent companies are slowed by the need to retrofit AI into existing processes and tribal knowledge. AI-native startups, however, can build their entire operational model around agent-based, prompt-driven workflows from day one, creating a structural advantage that is difficult for larger companies to copy.
Most successful SaaS companies weren't built on new core tech, but by packaging existing tech (like databases or CRMs) into solutions for specific industries. AI is no different. The opportunity lies in unbundling a general tool like ChatGPT and rebundling its capabilities into vertical-specific products.
The traditional SaaS method of asking customers what they want doesn't work for AI because customers can't imagine what's possible with the technology's "jagged" capabilities. Instead, teams must start with a deep, technology-first understanding of the models and then map that back to customer problems.
Incumbents face the innovator's dilemma; they can't afford to scrap existing infrastructure for AI. Startups can build "AI-native" from a clean sheet, creating a fundamental advantage that legacy players can't replicate by just bolting on features.
In the age of AI, 10-15 year old SaaS companies face an existential crisis. To stay relevant, they must be willing to make radical changes to culture and product, even if it threatens existing revenue. The alternative is becoming a legacy player as nimbler startups capture the market.
The conventional wisdom for SaaS companies to find their 'second act' after reaching $100M in revenue is now obsolete. The extreme rate of change in the AI space forces companies to constantly reinvent themselves and refind product-market fit on a quarterly basis to survive.
