Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.

In a severe supply shock, demand destruction isn't about wealthy consumers driving less. Instead, lower-income countries are priced out of the market entirely, unable to attract scarce barrels. This transforms a price problem for developed nations into an outright physical shortage for developing ones.

Inflation-adjusted data reveals two distinct oil price regimes: a common one around $60-$80 and a rare, high-priced "demand destruction" one above $130. Prices in the $100-$110 range are historically uncommon, suggesting the market snaps into a crisis mode rather than scaling linearly.

The significant drop in global oil demand is not primarily due to high prices (demand destruction), but rather a physical lack of availability. Cargoes are simply not arriving in regions like Southeast Asia, creating 'demand loss.' This distinction is critical, as it indicates a severe logistical breakdown rather than a typical market response to price elasticity.

The market impact from the expected, but unrealized, loss of 3 million barrels/day from Russia was immense. The current Strait of Hormuz disruption is four to five times larger at 14 million barrels/day. This scale of shortage is historically unprecedented, meaning past events are poor guides for predicting market outcomes.

The impact of an oil supply disruption on price is a convex function of its duration. A short-term closure results in delayed deliveries with minimal price effect, while a prolonged one exhausts storage and requires triple-digit prices to force demand destruction and rebalance the market.

Major historical oil price movements were triggered by supply-demand imbalances of just 2-3 million barrels per day. A disruption at the Strait of Hormuz would impact 20 million barrels daily, a scale that dwarfs previous crises and renders standard analytical models inadequate.

Current market stress isn't traditional demand destruction from high prices or a recession. It's a third, rarer type: physical unavailability. Supply chain lags mean barrels aren't where they need to be, causing localized shortages misinterpreted as a drop in consumer demand.

Emerging markets have already reduced oil consumption to a minimum due to physical supply unavailability ('demand loss'). Therefore, for the global market to rebalance, the next phase of demand reduction must come from developed economies like the U.S. and Europe. This will require significantly higher product prices to force a change in consumer behavior.