Sales slowness isn't a problem to be solved with better "urgency" tactics. It's a symptom of a fundamental shift: buyers are more thoughtful, decision-making is more distributed, and capital has more competing uses. Acknowledge this new reality instead of fighting it with outdated techniques.
Related Insights
Most sales are lost to inertia, not rejection. Implement a specific, escalating follow-up sequence (30 mins, 60 mins, next day) after sending an offer. This disciplined approach isn't pushy; it helps busy prospects make a decision while their interest is at its peak.
Stop trying to convince executives to adopt your priorities. Instead, identify their existing strategic initiatives—often with internal code names—and frame your solution as an accelerator for what they're already sold on doing. This dramatically reduces friction and speeds up deals.
If your buyers consistently wait until the end of the quarter, it's not just your strategy. Large software companies have conditioned the entire market to expect a discount for holding out, creating a systemic purchasing behavior that affects your deal velocity regardless of your own pricing policy.
Frame your sales stages around the decisions you need from a prospect (a 'get'), not the tasks you must complete (a 'do'). For example, the goal isn't 'do a demo,' it's 'get agreement that you're the vendor of choice.' This encourages creativity and efficiency, preventing unnecessary activities.
In B2B sales with multiple decision-makers, tracking individual MQLs is a "lazy metric" that misrepresents buying intent. Success depends on identifying and engaging the entire buying group. Marketing's goal should be to qualify the group, not just a single lead.
The biggest obstacle today isn't a "no," but "indecision" driven by risk aversion. Aggressive tactics can backfire by increasing fear. A salesperson's job is to reduce the perceived risk of a decision, not apply more pressure to close the deal.
Prospects often express interest to gather information but lack a commitment to solve the problem. Sellers must differentiate by probing for concrete timelines and stakeholder involvement to avoid chasing deals that won't close, rather than hoping to convert interest into commitment on the call.
In industries dominated by legacy players for decades, buyers lose the 'muscle' to evaluate new vendors. If you see low initial pull despite a strong value proposition, it may mean you need to educate the market on how to buy again, not that your product is wrong.
In a rapidly evolving market, the speed at which you can discard outdated strategies and adopt new ones is more critical than simply accumulating new knowledge. Professionals who can let go of 'what has always worked' will adapt and win faster than those who cling to legacy methods.
Don't measure deal progress by the number of meetings held. Instead, define specific exit criteria for each sales stage. A deal only moves forward when the prospect meets these criteria, which can happen with or without a live meeting. This reframes velocity around outcomes, not activities.