Counterintuitively, a model optimized for writing (GPT 5.1 High) excels at the planning stage in Cursor's "plan mode" due to its strength in logical thinking and step-by-step reasoning. For the actual code execution, switch to a coding-specific model like Sonnet.
Related Insights
LLMs often get stuck or pursue incorrect paths on complex tasks. "Plan mode" forces Claude Code to present its step-by-step checklist for your approval before it starts editing files. This allows you to correct its logic and assumptions upfront, ensuring the final output aligns with your intent and saving time.
Use the Claude chat application for deep research on technical architecture and best practices *before* coding. It can research topics for over 10 minutes, providing a well-summarized plan that you can then feed into a dedicated coding tool like Cursor or Claude Code for implementation.
Instead of writing Python or TypeScript to prototype an AI agent, PM Dennis Yang writes a "super MVP" using plain English instructions directly in Cursor. He leverages Cursor's built-in agentic capabilities, model switching, and tool-calling to test the agent's logic and flow without writing a single line of code.
For large tasks like creating a business plan, act as a project conductor. First, prompt the AI for individual components like a table of contents or specific sections. Once all parts are generated, use a final prompt to synthesize them into a coherent whole.
Achieve higher-quality results by using an AI to first generate an outline or plan. Then, refine that plan with follow-up prompts before asking for the final execution. This course-corrects early and avoids wasted time on flawed one-shot outputs, ultimately saving time.
While "vibe coding" tools are excellent for sparking interest and building initial prototypes, transitioning a project into a maintainable product requires learning the underlying code. AI code editors like Cursor act as the next step, helping users bridge the gap from prompt-based generation to hands-on software engineering.
Don't pay for Claude's most expensive tier just for coding. A hybrid approach uses the cheaper Claude Pro plan for its superior file-handling and writing. For heavy coding, switch to the terminal inside Cursor, which provides access to top models like Opus for only $20/month, creating a powerful stack for under $40.
Unlike tools that immediately generate code from a prompt, Replit first engages in a planning phase. It collaborates with the user to define the structure and goals before execution. This structured, plan-first approach makes it a far stronger and more useful tool for product managers.
A powerful but unintuitive AI development pattern is to give a model a vague goal and let it attempt a full implementation. This "throwaway" draft, with its mistakes and unexpected choices, provides crucial insights for writing a much more accurate plan for the final version.
For complex, one-time tasks like a code migration, don't just ask AI to write a script. Instead, have it build a disposable tool—a "jig" or "command center”—that visualizes the process and guides you through each step. This provides more control and understanding than a black-box script.
