The term "economic security" has evolved. FDR used it to mean a social safety net. The Clinton administration defined it as safe global free trade. Today, it's viewed through a national security lens, treating economic and technological strength as a core component of national power, similar to military or diplomacy.
Related Insights
The post-1980s neoliberal consensus of small government and free trade is being replaced by a mercantilist approach. Governments, particularly the U.S., now actively intervene to protect domestic industries and secure geopolitical strength, treating trade as a zero-sum game. This represents a fundamental economic shift for investors.
The concept of 'weaponized interdependence,' highlighted by China's use of export controls, is driving Asian nations like Japan, India, and South Korea to implement economic security acts. This shifts investment toward domestic supply chains in critical minerals, semiconductors, and defense, creating state-backed opportunities.
A METI official outlines a philosophy of 'peace through economic strength.' The objective is not to develop economic statecraft to weaken adversaries, but rather to enhance Japan's own technological superiority and supply chain autonomy. This strength, they believe, enables Japan to maintain better relationships and engage more freely in the global market.
The strategic competition with China is often viewed through a high-tech military lens, but its true power lies in dominating the low-tech supply chain. China can cripple other economies by simply withholding basic components like nuts, bolts, and screws, proving that industrial basics are a key geopolitical weapon.
Modern global conflict is primarily economic, not kinetic. Nations now engage in strategic warfare through currency debasement, asset seizures, and manipulating capital flows. The objective is to inflict maximum financial damage on adversaries, making economic policy a primary weapon of war.
The anxiety driving protectionism in the West stems from seeing other nations catch up, not from an absolute decline in living standards. This psychological fear of losing the top spot undermines national confidence and can trigger a dangerous, self-defeating shift toward isolationism.
Investing in defense, energy, and public safety is not just another vertical. These foundational sectors uphold the stable democracy on which all other tech, like B2B SaaS, depends. A failure in these foundations renders investments in higher-level software and services worthless.
The administration justifies taking equity stakes in private industries—a form of state capitalism—by reframing the global landscape as an "economic war." The pandemic exposed critical supply chain vulnerabilities in areas like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, making domestic production a matter of national security, similar to wartime industrial mobilization.
Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) defines its economic security strategy through two core pillars. 'Strategic indispensability' means possessing superior, leverageable technology that others need. 'Autonomy' refers to having resilient supply chains for critical goods like energy and food. This dual framework guides their national policy.
The latest U.S. National Security Strategy drops confrontational rhetoric about China as an ideological threat, instead framing the relationship around economic rivalry and rebalancing. This shift prioritizes tangible deals over promoting American values globally, marking a departure from Reagan-era foreign policy.
