Historically, the aggregate macroeconomic effects of government shutdowns are modest and reversible. A useful rule of thumb is that each week of a full shutdown reduces annualized quarterly GDP by just 0.1%. A partial shutdown, which is more likely, would have an even smaller impact on growth.
Related Insights
A shutdown doesn't just delay data reports; if it extends into mid-month, it prevents the government from conducting the surveys needed for future reports. This disrupts the entire data collection pipeline, causing a ripple effect that can obscure economic trends for months after the government reopens.
Despite causing significant personal hardship, government shutdowns have a minimal and short-lived impact on overall GDP. Lost federal worker pay is quickly restored upon reopening, and most economic activity catches up, making the net effect a near wash over subsequent quarters.
Investors should watch for the first missed paycheck for furloughed federal workers as a leading indicator. This event creates an immediate 2-4% drop in spending among affected workers, a tangible sign that the shutdown's economic impact is spreading beyond Washington D.C. and beginning to affect the broader economy.
The most significant danger of a prolonged government shutdown is the disruption to federal statistics. This creates an "unsettling" lack of visibility for policymakers, potentially causing them to miss a critical economic downturn and delay a necessary response. The direct GDP impact is often recoverable later.
The direct GDP impact from furloughed federal workers is small, mechanical, and quickly reversed. The more significant and lasting economic damage from a prolonged shutdown stems from its effect on the private sector, such as backlogged IPOs at the SEC or delayed construction projects waiting on permits.
Lutnick reveals an oddity in GDP calculation: furloughed federal employees, though still paid, are considered unproductive and thus subtracted from GDP. This accounting rule can create a misleadingly negative economic picture, with Lutnick estimating it could lower a quarterly GDP figure by as much as 1.5 percentage points.
Prolonged government shutdowns don't end due to broad GDP impact. Instead, a specific, high-visibility failure of public services, like an air traffic control stoppage, creates the necessary political urgency for a resolution by making the economic risk tangible and immediate.
Financial markets are likely to treat a potential government shutdown as temporary noise. Such events do not typically reprice the fundamental path of corporate earnings, inflation, or Federal Reserve policy, which remain the dominant drivers of asset performance. Investors will likely look past the disruption.
The economic cost of a government shutdown is not gradual. It is negligible for the first two weeks, becomes tangible at three to four weeks as paychecks are missed, and grows exponentially after a month as critical government services and benefits begin to break down, causing widespread disruption.
A government shutdown lasting several weeks poses a greater threat than just delayed reports. Data collection for time-sensitive indicators like the Consumer Price Index becomes impossible or unreliable, as prices can't be collected retroactively and people's recall fades, potentially forcing agencies to skip a month of data entirely.