Contrary to a slow market narrative, deal flow has sharply accelerated. Blackstone's Michael Zwadsky revealed that August 2024 was the firm's biggest investment committee month in three years, and the summer was the third most active for M&A since 2008, signaling a real inflection point for transactions.
Because boards lack deep expertise in AI's seismic impact, they are pursuing scale-driven M&A. The goal is to accumulate diverse assets ('cards in a deck') to maintain flexibility and strategic options in an unpredictable, AI-driven future, rather than making specific bets on the technology itself.
Current M&A activity related to AI isn't targeting AI model creators. Instead, capital is flowing into consolidating the 'picks and shovels' of the AI ecosystem. This includes derivative plays like data centers, semiconductors, software, and even power suppliers, which are seen as more tangible long-term assets.
Recent antitrust lawsuits against Meta and Google resulted in minimal consequences ("nothing burgers"), signaling a more permissive regulatory environment. Combined with anticipated economic stimulus, this creates ideal conditions for a wave of large-scale M&A ($25B-$250B) among major tech companies in the coming year.
The term 'private equity' is now insufficient. The M&A market's capital base has expanded to include sovereign wealth funds and large, tech-generated family offices that invest directly or co-invest like traditional PE firms. This diversification creates a larger, more resilient pool of capital for deals.
Large private equity firms are long on capital but short on deal origination. Ted Seides suggests a firm like Blackstone could adopt the Millennium hedge fund model: acquiring specialized deal teams and plugging them into a centralized risk and capital platform, effectively becoming a multi-manager PE firm.
While default risk exists, the more pressing problem for credit investors is a severe supply-demand imbalance. A shortage of new M&A and corporate issuance, combined with massive sideline capital (e.g., $8T in money markets), keeps spreads historically tight and makes finding attractive opportunities the main challenge.
Despite geopolitical risk and economic uncertainty, M&A is surging because companies are executing on long-term (20-30 year) strategic repositioning plans conceived post-COVID. When capital markets open, even briefly, companies are quick to act on these dormant, high-conviction plans, ignoring near-term volatility.
The most lucrative exit for a startup is often not an IPO, but an M&A deal within an oligopolistic industry. When 3-4 major players exist, they can be forced into an irrational bidding war driven by the fear of a competitor acquiring the asset, leading to outcomes that are even better than going public.
Venture capital isn't a constant sprint. It has distinct seasons, both in an investor's career (e.g., a 'deep learning' phase) and throughout the calendar year. Summer is for strategic thinking due to fewer meetings, while the period from Labor Day to Thanksgiving is peak deal-making season.
The anticipated flood of businesses for sale from retiring baby boomers—the "silver tsunami"—has not materialized as predicted. Owners are holding on longer while the pool of buyers has increased, causing demand to outstrip supply and keeping acquisition multiples high.