Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Buyers often refuse to sign with an exclusive broker, believing they can find a better deal independently. This strategy is counterproductive, as it can lead to non-reputable parties flipping an aircraft for a quick profit at the buyer's expense. An exclusive broker is aligned with the buyer's best interests.

Related Insights

First-time buyers often underestimate the total cost of ownership. Beyond the initial purchase, annual expenses for pilots, hangar space, insurance, maintenance, and fuel can easily reach $2 to $4 million, making the purchase price just the entry ticket to a much larger financial commitment.

Franchise brokering lacks the licensing and disclosure requirements common in fields like real estate. Brokers can operate without certification and earn commissions up to 60% of the franchise fee, creating a powerful incentive to sell you on a limited set of partner brands rather than finding the best fit.

TeamShares initially planned to source deals directly to avoid high broker fees. They quickly learned that, like the "For Sale By Owner" (FSBO) market in real estate, small business owners need and are willing to pay for the expertise brokers provide during a complex, infrequent transaction, making direct sourcing ineffective at scale.

While most acquirers rely on brokers, platforms like Craigslist or Facebook Marketplace can be a hidden source of off-market deals. Very small, less sophisticated business owners often default to these simple platforms to sell, creating unique opportunities for diligent searchers.

Businesses are often sold by a senior, experienced agency leader, only to be handed off to a junior-level employee for the actual work. During the sales process, you must explicitly ask who you will be working with daily, confirm their experience, and even request to speak with them directly.

A top broker's value isn't just finding a buyer; it's orchestrating the deal. This includes securing complex public financing (like a TERS zone) and development agreements before closing. This de-risks the project for the buyer, increases the property's value, and justifies a higher commission.

While it seems counterintuitive, offering all cash instead of a mix of stock and earnouts can be cheaper for the buyer. Sellers heavily discount the value of stock and view earnouts as having little to no value. A clean, all-cash offer provides certainty, which is highly attractive to sellers and can lead them to accept a lower headline price than a complex, messy deal structure.

Forgoing an investment banker is only advisable under three conditions: 1) The buyer is highly credible with a track record, 2) You are confident your company will withstand deep diligence, and 3) You are perfectly happy to continue owning the business if the deal collapses. This trifecta minimizes the risk of a failed one-off process.

Sellers fail not from a lack of confidence, but from the core belief that the buyer with the money holds the power. This mindset is reinforced because they behave the same way as buyers themselves. To regain control, sellers must fundamentally change their belief system and act as the authority in the process.

Even well-intentioned sellers are motivated to close a deal and may present information in the most favorable light. This is often a human behavioral bias, not malicious lying. Acquirers must actively challenge and validate seller statements by testing assumptions and seeking external information.