Google's culture has become slow and risk-averse, not due to a lack of talent, but because its cushy compensation packages discourage top employees from leaving. This fosters an environment where talented individuals are incentivized to take fewer risks, hindering bold innovation, particularly in the fast-moving AI space.
Related Insights
Paying billions for talent via acquihires or massive compensation packages is a logical business decision in the AI era. When a company is spending tens of billions on CapEx, securing the handful of elite engineers who can maximize that investment's ROI is a justifiable and necessary expense.
In the hyper-competitive AI talent market, companies like OpenAI are dropping the standard one-year vesting cliff. With equity packages worth millions, top candidates are unwilling to risk getting nothing if they leave before 12 months, forcing a shift in compensation norms.
Despite theories that Google will offer its AI for free to bankrupt competitors, its deep-seated corporate culture of high margins (historically 80%+) makes a prolonged, zero-profit strategy difficult. As a public company, Google faces immense investor pressure to monetize new technologies quickly, unlike a startup.
Top AI labs face a difficult talent problem: if they restrict employee equity liquidity, top talent leaves for higher salaries. If they provide too much liquidity, newly-wealthy researchers leave to found their own competing startups, creating a constant churn that seeds the ecosystem with new rivals.
To compete with massive compensation packages from Meta and OpenAI, smaller startups like Suno must counter-pitch a strong, mission-driven culture. They argue that eliminating vesting cliffs fosters a transient, "mercenary" workforce, which they can resist by attracting talent passionate about their specific domain, like the intersection of AI and music.
Rewarding successful outcomes incentivizes employees to choose less risky, less innovative projects they know they can complete. To foster true moonshots, Alphabet's X rewards behaviors like humility and curiosity, trusting that these habits are the leading indicators of long-term breakthroughs.
Andrej Karpathy asserts that the liquidity of employee stock options is the "dominant first order term" driving talent behavior at frontier AI labs. Poor liquidity, as allegedly seen at Anthropic, reduces employee churn as it makes it harder for talent to leave and fund new ventures.
The very best engineers optimize for their most precious asset: their time. They are less motivated by competing salary offers and more by the quality of the team, the problem they're solving, and the agency to build something meaningful without becoming a "cog" in a machine.
The frenzied competition for the few thousand elite AI scientists has created a culture of constant job-hopping for higher pay, akin to a sports transfer season. This instability is slowing down major scientific progress, as significant breakthroughs require dedicated teams working together for extended periods, a rarity in the current environment.
As the market leader, OpenAI has become risk-averse to avoid media backlash. This has “damaged the product,” making it overly cautious and less useful. Meanwhile, challengers like Google have adopted a risk-taking posture, allowing them to innovate faster. This shows how a defensive mindset can cede ground to hungrier competitors.
