The company's win rate collapsed to a catastrophic 3-5%, well below benchmarks. This inefficiency was a direct result of their 80% pipeline visibility gap. Without knowing which triggers produced quality deals, they were trying to fix the problem with a blindfold on, unable to make data-driven decisions.
Related Insights
Most B2B companies have a massive blind spot in the poorly tracked period before an opportunity is created. This "black box" of pre-pipeline activity prevents leaders from diagnosing what is truly working, leading to flat growth and inefficient spending.
Board reports often highlight positive top-line growth (e.g., "deals are up 25%") while ignoring underlying process flaws. This "fluff" reporting hides massive inefficiencies, like an abysmal lead-to-deal conversion rate, preventing the business from addressing the root causes of waste and suboptimal performance.
The company's overall win rate was low (6-7%) and decreasing. Analysis showed this decline mirrored a drop in marketing 'signals' (e.g., event attendance, content downloads) before an opportunity was created. This provided a clear data link between mid-funnel marketing activities and sales success.
Most GTM systems track initial outreach and final outcomes but fail to quantify the critical journey in between. This "ginormous gray area" of engagement makes it impossible to understand which activities truly influence pipeline, leading to flawed, outcome-based decision-making instead of journey-based optimization.
The unmeasured activities between lead generation and opportunity creation—the "pipeline black box"—is the biggest failure point for B2B companies. Analyzing this SDR/BDR process for patterns is the key to systematically engineering pipeline growth, not just guessing.
The company had a significant 'prospecting black box.' For 40% of all opportunities, there was no traceable sales trigger or activity log, such as logged calls. This meant they couldn't measure or optimize a huge portion of their pipeline creation process, particularly SDR outbound efforts.
With 50% of opportunities lacking associated contacts, marketing was flying blind. For a high ACV business with long sales cycles, this is a critical failure. It prevents understanding the buying committee, multi-threading, and nurturing different personas, rendering marketing ineffective during active deals.
A key reason for the company's low win rate wasn't just poor execution; it was a flawed process. Sales reps created 'opportunities' to track target accounts for prospecting, not actual qualified deals. This practice completely polluted their pipeline metrics and disguised the true performance of their sales motion.
While the company's overall win rate was a dismal 3-5%, opportunities from high-intent 'hand raiser' leads (e.g., demo requests) converted at 14%. This shows a highly effective GTM motion was being completely obscured by blended pipeline data, causing the team to overlook and underinvest in their most valuable channel.
A $25 million SaaS company discovered that 80% of its pipeline was effectively invisible. They tracked the 'deal source' (the last touch) instead of the 'prospecting trigger' (what initiated sales outreach), leaving them blind to what actually generated opportunities.