Move beyond MQLs by measuring impact across the full lifecycle. Measure 1) Preference: Did buyers engage before an opportunity was created? 2) Acceleration: Did marketing's presence improve win rates on existing opportunities? 3) Creation: Did marketing source demand that wouldn't have otherwise existed?

Metrics like "Marketing Qualified Lead" are meaningless to the customer. Instead, define key performance indicators around the value a customer receives. A good KPI answers the question: "Have we delivered enough value to convince them to keep going to the next stage?"

The MQL was originally a contract: marketing provides quality leads, and sales commits to follow-up. The system broke when marketing, judged on MQL volume, lowered the quality bar to hit arbitrary goals. This turned the MQL into a lever for volume, not a filter for quality, destroying sales' trust.

Instead of abandoning the MQL framework and overhauling systems, marketers should redefine what constitutes an MQL. Focus on high-intent signals (like free trial starts) rather than low-value actions (like email opens). The MQL is a delivery system, and your definition controls its quality.

Top-performing companies are abandoning traditional metrics like MQLs. They now focus on understanding the entire prospecting process—from lead creation to BDR/SDR engagement—to generate stronger pipeline, higher win rates, and more revenue with less wasted effort.

CMO Ben Schechter argues that tracking raw lead count is a dangerous metric. A marketing leader can easily manipulate lead scoring to hit a volume target, flooding sales with low-quality prospects. This erodes sales team trust and causes them to stop following up on all marketing-generated leads.

Industry metrics like needing 18 touches or a 4x pipeline are often symptoms of a problem, not goals. Instead of blindly increasing activity, leaders should investigate the root cause. High numbers usually indicate ineffective messaging or poor qualification, not a lack of effort.

In B2B sales with multiple decision-makers, tracking individual MQLs is a "lazy metric" that misrepresents buying intent. Success depends on identifying and engaging the entire buying group. Marketing's goal should be to qualify the group, not just a single lead.

The issue with metrics like MQLs is rooted in CRM architecture. A single lead record cannot accurately reflect the non-linear reality of a buyer's journey, which involves multiple cycles of engagement and disqualification. Historical data gets overwritten, obscuring the true path to conversion.