Key economic and health data, termed "national statistical products," are shielded from political interference by an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directive, not by law. This means a president could instruct their OMB to change the policy, potentially compromising the apolitical nature of vital statistics.
The recent government shutdown will create a permanent void in crucial economic data for October. While statistics like payrolls might be collected retroactively, survey-based data such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and household unemployment figures are likely lost forever due to recall bias, creating a black hole in the historical record.
A key second-order risk of the government shutdown is the halt of incoming economic data. This data blackout impairs the Federal Reserve's ability to make informed monetary policy decisions, creating significant uncertainty for investors and the broader economy ahead of key meetings.
Private firms like ADP have business incentives that may conflict with the public's need for consistent economic data. ADP's recent decision to stop providing weekly data to the Fed during a government shutdown highlights this tension and the irreplaceability of official government statistics.
Unlike the 2018 shutdown, the Bureau of Labor Statistics may not have funding this time, potentially halting the release of non-farm payrolls and CPI data. This would leave the highly data-dependent Federal Reserve and markets "flying blind" at a critical monetary policy juncture.
The most significant danger of a prolonged government shutdown is the disruption to federal statistics. This creates an "unsettling" lack of visibility for policymakers, potentially causing them to miss a critical economic downturn and delay a necessary response. The direct GDP impact is often recoverable later.
Shutdowns halt the release of key data like jobs reports and inflation figures. This obstructs the Federal Reserve's ability to make informed interest rate decisions, creating market uncertainty. It also delays Social Security COLA calculations, impacting millions of retirees who rely on that data.
Former BLS Commissioner Erica Groshen argues the agency's automated process makes it nearly impossible to manipulate a single report. The real danger is systemic change, like converting career civil servants into political appointees who can be fired, gradually eroding the agency's culture of impartiality.
A key indirect risk of a shutdown is the delay of vital data releases on labor and inflation. This forces investors and the Fed to operate in an information vacuum, increasing uncertainty and the potential to overreact to anecdotal signals, creating outsized market effects.
The government's failure to release key economic reports (jobs, GDP, inflation) creates a dangerous information vacuum, forcing the Fed and businesses to operate without instruments. This void presents a significant business opportunity for private companies to develop and sell alternative economic data streams and forecasting models to fill the gap.
The CDC's function isn't to create policy mandates but to provide scientific outcomes to policymakers (e.g., "If everyone wears masks, COVID spread will decrease"). This distinction leaves value-based policy decisions to elected leaders, preserving the agency's scientific objectivity.