M&A teams often kill their pipeline by applying overly restrictive criteria at the long-list stage. A better approach is to be more lenient, focusing on only 3-4 critical criteria. This creates a large pool of potential targets, fostering a healthy funnel dynamic instead of a restrictive "must-win" tunnel.
Contrary to the 'always be closing' mindset, the goal of early-stage qualification should be disqualification. Advancing deals based on mere 'interest' rather than true 'intent' leads to bloated pipelines and low win rates. Getting to 'no' quickly is more efficient than chasing unqualified leads.
Encourage sales and BDR teams to disqualify leads and close-loss deals quickly. This 'fail fast' approach cleans the pipeline, focuses effort on viable opportunities, and provides a rapid, clear feedback loop to marketing on lead quality and campaign effectiveness.
A stated M&A strategy is only a hypothesis. To validate it, present the leadership team with actual potential targets that fit the criteria. Their reactions will reveal their true appetite and expose any misalignment between the written strategy and their operational instincts, saving time and effort.
Instead of maximizing the volume of prospects at the top of the funnel, strategically narrow your focus to fewer, high-potential accounts. This 'martini glass' approach prioritizes depth and engagement over sheer productivity, leading to better quality opportunities.
When establishing a new M&A function, the primary challenge is getting senior leaders to move beyond broad statements and make concrete strategic choices about which opportunities to actively ignore. This focus is crucial for effective execution and prevents wasted energy on opportunistic, unfocused deals.
To counteract the natural pressure to "do deals," roll-up operators should build an overwhelmingly large target pipeline. Scarcity creates a "must-win" mentality, leading to poor decisions. An abundant pipeline makes it easier to say no to subpar opportunities and stick to the investment thesis.
Instead of a linear process, treat M&A as a spiral. Constantly revisit and adjust deal structure, diligence findings, and integration plans. A discovery in one area (e.g., diligence) should trigger a reassessment of the others (e.g., deal structure), ensuring a cohesive and de-risked outcome.
If a compelling target company doesn't align with your M&A framework, don't just kill the deal. Use it as a prompt to re-evaluate your strategy. The target might be a sign that your initial assumptions were flawed. The choice isn't just "yes/no" on the deal, but "is our strategy still right?".
Average reps find security in a pipeline packed with low-quality leads (a "sewer pipe"). Top performers prioritize quality over quantity, resulting in a leaner but more potent pipeline (a "water tap"). They are comfortable with fewer opportunities because they know what's in there is highly qualified and likely to close.
A five-step framework—Deep Dive, Battle Test, Communicate, Run Funnel, Commit to Close—is designed for smaller companies to execute M&A with focus and agility. It emphasizes using a firm but flexible framework over a rigid, step-by-step playbook.