Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Contrary to demos showing AI building a full feature, experienced developers break work into the smallest logical commits first (e.g., refactor, new endpoint, tests). They then prompt the AI for each individual commit, ensuring changes are focused, reviewable, and maintainable.

Related Insights

AI tools accelerate development. Instead of using this new speed to add more features (increasing scope), designers should leverage it to deepen the craft and quality of the core, essential features, creating an experience users have never seen before.

Even though modern AI coding assistants can handle complex, single-shot requests, it's more reliable to build an application in stages. First, build the core functionality, then add secondary features, and finally add tertiary elements like download buttons. This iterative approach prevents the AI from getting confused.

AI development tools can be "resistant," ignoring change requests. A powerful technique is to prompt the AI to consider multiple options and ask for your choice before building. This prevents it from making incorrect unilateral decisions, such as applying a navigation change to the entire site by mistake.

When an AI coding assistant goes off track, it can be hard to undo the damage. Developer Terry Lynn mitigates this risk by programming his AI workflow to make a Git commit before and after each small phase of a task. This creates a trail of "breadcrumbs," allowing him to easily revert to a stable state if the AI makes a mistake.

High productivity isn't about using AI for everything. It's a disciplined workflow: breaking a task into sub-problems, using an LLM for high-leverage parts like scaffolding and tests, and reserving human focus for the core implementation. This avoids the sunk cost of forcing AI on unsuitable tasks.

Contrary to the belief that AI levels the playing field, senior engineers extract more value from it. They leverage their experience to guide the AI, critically review its output as they would a junior hire's code, and correct its mistakes. This allows them to accelerate their workflow without blindly shipping low-quality code.

Don't ask an AI agent to build an entire product at once. Structure your plan as a series of features. For each step, have the AI build the feature, then immediately write a test for it. The AI should only proceed to the next feature once the current one passes its test.

As AI writes most of the code, the highest-leverage human activity will shift from reviewing pull requests to reviewing the AI's research and implementation plans. Collaborating on the plan provides a narrative journey of the upcoming changes, allowing for high-level course correction before hundreds of lines of bad code are ever generated.

The panel suggests a best practice for AI prototyping tools: focus on pinpointed interactions or small, specific user flows. Once a prototype grows to encompass the entire product, it's more efficient to move directly into the codebase, as you're past the point of exploration.

The productivity boost from AI is not 'free time.' Successful senior developers reallocate minutes saved on code generation towards more rigorous structuring of commits, critical review of AI output, and thoughtful documentation. This discipline prevents the rapid accumulation of AI-generated technical debt.