Companies like Stripe are avoiding IPOs because the private markets now solve the two main historical drivers: access to capital and employee liquidity. With annual secondary tenders and vast private funding available, the traditional benefits of going public are no longer compelling for many late-stage startups.

A true bubble, like the dot-com crash, involves stock prices falling over 50% and staying depressed for years, with capital infusion dropping similarly. Short-term market corrections don't meet this historical definition. The current AI boom, despite frothiness, doesn't exhibit these signs yet.

While massive, oversubscribed follow-on financings for companies with positive data indicate renewed investor appetite, the true market recovery hinges on the IPO window reopening. Analysts remain deeply divided on whether 2026 will see a significant number of IPOs, suggesting a fragile recovery.

The venue for tech value creation has dramatically shifted from public to private markets. For recent IPOs, over half of their market cap was generated while private, a stark reversal from ten years prior when 88% of value was created post-IPO.

In the 1980s, companies like Apple went public early as a fundraising necessity, allowing public investors to capture most of the growth. Today, robust private markets mean companies stay private longer, making IPOs primarily a liquidity event for insiders and VCs, with less upside left for the public.

Despite initial excitement, the market's enthusiasm for IPOs has cooled significantly. Many newly public tech companies, including high-quality ones like Figma, are trading well below their peaks or even their IPO price, indicating the floodgates for public exits have not truly reopened.

The current AI market resembles the early, productive phase of the dot-com era, not its speculative peak. Key indicators like reasonable big tech valuations and low leverage suggest a foundational technology shift is underway, contrasting with the market frenzy of the late 90s.

Unlike past downturns caused by recessions or banking failures, the current market stagnation exists despite strong fundamentals. With over a trillion in dry powder and ample credit available, the paralysis is driven by behavioral factors and valuation disputes, not a broken financial system.

Insiders and CEOs are generally good at timing capital allocation, issuing shares when prices are high and buying back when low. The current lack of equity issuance from high-flying tech companies suggests their leadership doesn't view their stock as overvalued, despite having clear reasons to raise capital.