While mega-unicorns like Stripe have private liquidity options, their failure to IPO removes a crucial market benchmark. This uncertainty about public market appetite poses a significant liquidity threat to the next 25-50 companies in an LP's portfolio, which lack the same private demand.

The venue for tech value creation has dramatically shifted from public to private markets. For recent IPOs, over half of their market cap was generated while private, a stark reversal from ten years prior when 88% of value was created post-IPO.

The traditional IPO exit is being replaced by a perpetual secondary market for elite private companies. This new paradigm provides liquidity for investors and employees without the high costs and regulatory burdens of going public. This shift fundamentally alters the venture capital lifecycle, enabling longer private holding periods.

Top-tier private companies like Stripe and Databricks are actively choosing to delay IPOs, viewing the public market as an inferior "product." With access to cheaper private capital and freedom from quarterly scrutiny and activist investors, staying private offers a better environment to build long-term value.

Top companies like Stripe or SpaceX can stay private forever by using robust secondary markets to provide liquidity to employees and investors. This allows them to focus on long-term growth without the burdens of public company reporting and quarterly profit pressures.

For high-growth companies, reaching a $100M ARR milestone no longer automatically triggers IPO plans. With abundant private capital, many founders now see going public as an unnecessary burden, preferring to avoid SEC reporting and gain liquidity through private growth rounds.

Companies like Databricks and Stripe represent a new asset class: "Post-IPO Scale, Still Private." They have surpassed the revenue and scale typically required for an IPO but choose to remain private. This creates a distinct investment category separate from traditional late-stage venture, driven by the perceived disadvantages of public markets.

The abundance of private capital means the most successful companies no longer need to go public for growth funding. This disrupts the traditional VC model, where IPOs are a primary exit path, forcing firms to re-evaluate how and when they achieve liquidity for their limited partners, even for their best assets.

The trend of companies staying private longer and raising huge late-stage rounds isn't just about VC exuberance. It's a direct consequence of a series of regulations (like Sarbanes-Oxley) that made going public extremely costly and onerous. As a result, the private capital markets evolved to fill the gap, fundamentally changing venture capital.