Combining polatuzumab vedotin with bispecific antibodies appears particularly effective for patients with double-hit lymphoma. This is significant because these high-risk patients, who have poor prognoses, were notably excluded from pivotal trials like STAR GLOW, suggesting a potential new standard for this specific subgroup.
Related Insights
The future of advanced prostate cancer treatment may involve combining ADCs with bispecific T-cell engagers. This strategy could use ADCs for a short duration to deliver a potent hit, followed by immunotherapy to achieve durable remission, potentially reducing toxicity and enabling earlier use.
Data from J&J's Majestic 3 trial suggests its off-the-shelf bispecific combination could rival the efficacy of its own blockbuster CAR-T, Carvykti. This sets up an internal competition where a more accessible therapy could challenge a complex, personalized one in earlier lines of treatment.
An innovative strategy for solid tumors involves using bispecific T-cell engagers to target the tumor stroma—the protective fibrotic tissue surrounding the tumor. This novel approach aims to first eliminate this physical barrier, making the cancer cells themselves more vulnerable to subsequent immune attack.
The traditional "germinal center" (GC) classification for DLBCL is overly simplistic. Molecular analysis reveals distinct subtypes within GC, such as "dark zone" and "light zone" signatures, which have different prognoses and responses to targeted therapies like polatuzumab.
In follicular lymphoma, the treatment goal is durable remission with manageable toxicity, not necessarily a cure. Therefore, clinicians frequently prefer using a bispecific antibody first, reserving the more complex and toxic CAR-T cell therapy for transformed disease or after a bispecific fails.
Not all CD20-targeting bispecifics can be combined with rituximab. Mosunetuzumab binds the same epitope, causing competition. However, glofitamab and epcoritamab bind different epitopes, allowing for logical and potentially synergistic combinations with rituximab-based regimens.
The regimen's profound success in relapsed/refractory patients is not an endpoint, but a launchpad. It provides the rationale for the ongoing Epcor FL2 trial, which directly challenges standard chemoimmunotherapy and could establish a chemotherapy-free, bispecific-based combination as the new first-line standard of care.
Long-term follow-up from the pivotal epcoritamab trial reveals that 46% of DLBCL patients who achieve a complete remission maintain it at four years. This durability provides strong evidence that bispecific monotherapy, not just CAR-T, can be a curative treatment for a subset of patients.
The dramatic efficacy boost from adding epcoritamab suggests it's the primary driver of patient benefit, not just an adjunct. This shifts the conceptual framework, positioning the bispecific antibody as the new therapeutic backbone, with rituximab and lenalidomide as supportive agents.
The ECHELON-3 trial showed that brentuximab vedotin plus R-squared is effective in relapsed/refractory DLBCL, even in patients with negligible CD30 expression. This suggests the drug's benefit may stem from immune synergy or other mechanisms, not just direct CD30 targeting.