Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Dan Shipper's AI-forward company, Every, doubled in size over the past year. He argues that automation is not a replacement for humans; every agent and automated system requires human oversight, management, and maintenance, thus creating more work and new roles.

Related Insights

The common fear of AI eliminating jobs is misguided. In practice, AI automates specific, often administrative, tasks within a role. This allows human workers to offload minutiae and focus on uniquely human skills like relationship building and strategic thinking, ultimately increasing their leverage and value.

Counterintuitively, making a task cheaper and easier with AI doesn't just eliminate jobs; it drastically increases the overall demand for that task. Just as Excel created more accountants, AI's efficiencies will lead to an explosion in the volume of work, creating new roles and opportunities.

AI makes tasks cheaper and faster. This increased efficiency doesn't reduce the need for workers; instead, it increases the demand for their work, as companies can now afford to do more of it. This creates a positive feedback loop that may lead to more hiring, not less.

As AI agents increasingly automate tasks, the cost of 'doing' work plummets. Greg Brockman argues the most valuable and scarce resource becomes human attention for oversight, judgment, and ensuring AI actions align with high-level goals and values. The core of future work will be deciding 'what' and 'why', not 'how'.

Contrary to the popular job-loss narrative, companies heavily using AI are growing faster and hiring more people to manage increased demand. Studies from Wharton and hiring data from platforms like Indeed show that AI tools create leverage, enabling new businesses and expanding existing ones, thus increasing the overall need for human workers in new or adapted roles.

Contrary to popular belief, AI adoption drives business growth so rapidly that companies often need to hire more staff to manage the increased demand. A Wharton study found the vast majority of enterprise leaders using AI planned to increase their human workforce, shifting the focus from job replacement to job transformation.

The idea that AI will enable billion-dollar companies with tiny teams is a myth. Increased productivity from AI raises the competitive bar and opens up more opportunities, compelling ambitious companies to hire more people to build more product and win.

The rapid pace of AI development means the main "job" being taken is that of the last generation's inferior AI model. A human's role evolves into that of a manager, constantly evaluating and deploying the newest, most capable AI tool for a given task, rather than being replaced by it.

History shows automation often expands professions rather than eliminating them. The electronic spreadsheet, predicted to kill accounting jobs, instead increased the number of accountants fourfold by making their services cheaper and creating new demand. The key question is if demand for human analysis and oversight is similarly elastic.

The Jevons Paradox observes that technologies increasing efficiency often boost consumption rather than reduce it. Applied to AI, this means while some jobs will be automated, the increased productivity will likely expand the scope and volume of work, creating new roles, much like typewriters ultimately increased secretarial work.