Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The military's reliance on standoff munitions is a crutch. Without them, the US is unwilling to accept the pilot risk required to use its vast stockpiles of conventional "gravity bombs," effectively paralyzing its air campaign capabilities against even non-peer adversaries.

Related Insights

The US has expended its high-end, long-range munitions in a hypothetical Iran conflict. This creates a critical vulnerability, as these weapons were stockpiled for a potential peer conflict with China, and the industrial base cannot quickly replace them.

The current munitions crisis is an opportunity to shift from expensive, slow-to-produce weapons like JASM-ERs to cheaper, modular systems. This rebalancing is necessary because high-end "exquisite" technologies have long, tenuous supply chains and cannot be produced at the scale required for a major conflict.

The US is expending advanced, expensive munitions like JASMs and Dark Eagle on targets in Iran that could be handled by cheaper weapons. This is described as using exquisite tools for mundane tasks, driven more by a desire to showcase new tech than strategic necessity, dangerously depleting critical stockpiles.

The U.S. is facing a severe depletion of its precision munitions stockpiles, estimated at over 50%. This shortage severely constrains its ability to sustain a conflict with Iran while simultaneously maintaining a credible deterrent against China, creating a significant strategic vulnerability and weakening its global power projection.

The US Defense Industrial Base is optimized for a few high-cost, technologically advanced platforms. This model fails to meet the demands of modern conflicts, which require large volumes of affordable, attritable hardware to counter tactics used by adversaries in Ukraine and the Middle East.

The preference for using expensive standoff weapons stems from a command level that is both highly risk-averse and has, to some degree, forgotten how to synchronize complex operations like Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD). This avoids pilot risk but prevents the use of more plentiful, cheaper munitions.

A key indicator of progress in an air campaign is the "munitions transition." This is when forces can move from using expensive, long-range standoff missiles to cheaper, plentiful gravity bombs because the enemy's air defenses have been sufficiently degraded, allowing aircraft to fly closer to targets.

Contrary to political rhetoric suggesting total dominance, US air superiority in Iran is limited to specific geographic areas and time-sensitive windows. This lack of persistent control forces the use of expensive, high-end munitions to mitigate risk to pilots, further draining valuable inventories needed for a high-end fight.

Simulations of a conflict with China consistently show the US depleting its high-end munitions in about seven days. The industrial base then requires two to three years to replenish these stockpiles, revealing a massive gap between military strategy and production capacity that undermines deterrence.

To neutralize Iran's ability to threaten shipping, the US would need a sustained air campaign using laser-guided bombs against mobile targets in rough terrain. This requires aircraft to get close, exposing them to enemy air defenses. The current "tit-for-tat" approach avoids this risk but is strategically ineffective.