Japan's framework, requiring 100% backing by liquid assets and banning algorithmic stablecoins, is intentionally strict. This approach aims to build institutional trust and position its yen stablecoin as a highly reliable and secure digital asset on the global stage, contrasting with less-regulated cryptocurrencies.
Despite being a latecomer, Japan's regulatory framework is setting a global precedent. Its strict requirements—such as 100% backing by high-quality liquid assets and a ban on algorithmic stablecoins—are being mirrored by other major financial centers, positioning Japan's model as the new standard for trust and stability.
By creating a regulatory framework that requires private stablecoins to be backed 1-to-1 by U.S. Treasuries, the government can prop up demand for its ever-increasing debt. This strategy is less about embracing financial innovation and more about extending the U.S. dollar's lifespan as the global reserve currency.
For hundreds of millions in developing nations, stablecoins are not an investment vehicle but a capital preservation tool. Their core value is providing a simple hedge against high-inflation local currencies by pegging to the USD, a use case that far outweighs the desire for interest yield in those markets.
Rather than viewing Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and private stablecoins as competitors, Japan's approach suggests a complementary relationship. A government CBDC could serve as foundational public infrastructure, upon which private sector stablecoins can build innovative financial applications and services.
In a novel attempt to delay a debt crisis, policymakers are pushing for regulations that would force stablecoin issuers to back their digital dollars one-to-one with U.S. Treasuries. This cleverly creates a new, captive international market for government debt, helping to prop up the system.
Instead of disrupting the established SWIFT network, Japan's stablecoins are positioned to work alongside it. They offer a parallel system for faster, cheaper transactions, potentially reducing fees by up to 80%, while leveraging SWIFT's existing trust and compliance frameworks for broader adoption.
For stablecoin companies like Tether seeking legitimacy in the US market, the simplest path is to back their assets with US treasuries. This aligns their interests with the US government, turning a potential adversary into a welcome buyer of national debt, even if it means lower returns compared to riskier assets.
While stablecoins gain attention, tokenized deposits offer similar benefits—like on-chain transactions—but operate within the existing, trusted regulatory banking framework. As they are simply bank liabilities on a blockchain, they may become a more palatable alternative for corporates seeking efficiency without regulatory uncertainty.
Beyond simple consumer payments, the most significant impact of Japan's stablecoins will be on its financial market infrastructure. By enabling real-time settlement for securities like stocks and bonds—a process that currently takes days—stablecoins can dramatically increase efficiency and reduce counterparty risk.
Japan's approach is not an "either/or" choice between CBDCs and private stablecoins. It views a potential government-issued CBDC as the foundational public infrastructure upon which private companies can build innovative stablecoin-based financial products and services, fostering a dual-track digital economy.