Critics of AI-driven economic collapse argue these scenarios wrongly assume a static economy. Historically, massive productivity gains from technology have lowered costs, expanded markets, and created entirely new industries and forms of consumption, rather than just eliminating jobs.

In the short term, a large wave of automation could lead to a recession. If many people lose their jobs simultaneously, their spending will decrease significantly. This creates a shortfall in aggregate demand, causing the economy to slump before the long-term productivity benefits of AI can be realized.

For the first time in history, AI could create a world where our ability to produce goods and services outstrips our capacity to consume them. This poses a fundamental challenge to traditional economic models built on scarcity and resource allocation.

The narrative of AI destroying jobs misses a key point: AI allows companies to 'hire software for a dollar' for tasks that were never economical to assign to humans. This will unlock new services and expand the economy, creating demand in areas that previously didn't exist.

The tangible economic effect of the AI boom is currently concentrated in physical capital investment, such as data centers and software, rather than widespread changes in labor productivity or employment. A potential market correction would thus directly threaten this investment-led growth.

Economists see no AI job loss in data because, like cheaper coal in the 1860s, cheaper intelligence via AI doesn't shrink demand. Instead, it explodes it, creating new roles and applications that offset initial displacement.

The panic-inducing Citrini paper, which caused a market sell-off, assumes a static economy where AI only destroys jobs. It completely ignores historical precedents where new efficiencies unlock unforeseen demand and create entirely new industries, a concept similar to the Jevons paradox.

In a high-impact AI scenario, massive productivity growth leads to gluts of goods and services. This causes prices to collapse, creating massive deflation. This deflation acts as a universal pay raise, dramatically increasing everyone's real wealth and purchasing power.

The fear of AI-driven mass unemployment is a classic economic fallacy. Like past technologies, AI is a tool that raises the marginal productivity of individual workers. More productive workers don't work less; they take on more ambitious projects and create new kinds of jobs, increasing the overall demand for labor.