Criticism from those who have not achieved what you're aiming for is irrelevant noise. People who are more successful in a given domain rarely criticize those trying to follow. The loudest critics are typically on the sidelines, with ample time to comment because they aren't actively building anything themselves.
Related Insights
For top performers surrounded by 'yes-men,' the most valuable friends are those who provide ruthless honesty. Like Jimmy Iovine to Bruce Springsteen, they tell you when your work sucks or when you're lying to yourself, which is essential for growth.
Early-stage founders must actively curate their social circles. Friends or family who exhibit 'tall poppy syndrome'—mocking entrepreneurial aspirations or viewing them with cynicism—can be a significant drag. Surrounding yourself with optimistic people who are also 'winning' is crucial for momentum.
People who cheered for you on your way up may turn to criticism once you've surpassed them. This isn't necessarily malice; your success can unintentionally highlight the compromises or comfort they chose, leading to resentment. Understand this dynamic to navigate relationships as you grow.
When receiving criticism or mentorship, evaluate the person's entire life—not just their success in one domain. If their family life, health, or character are not what you aspire to, their advice may be misaligned with your values, regardless of their financial or professional achievements.
Certain individuals have a proven, high success rate in their domain. Rather than relying solely on your own intuition or A/B testing, treat these people as APIs. Query them for feedback on your ideas to get a high-signal assessment of your blind spots and chances of success.
The most vitriolic critics of your startup are almost never successful founders. People 'in the arena' understand the struggle and offer constructive feedback. Detractors are often 'in the stands,' tearing others down because they haven't experienced the challenges of building something worthwhile.
Author Steven Pressfield advises against writers' groups for feedback. You risk getting input from peers who lack expertise and may be motivated by jealousy. This can be more destructive than helpful. Instead, find a single, trusted mentor who truly understands your vision.
Reframe negative comments as a reflection of the commenter's own unhappiness, not a valid critique of your work. People who take time to spread negativity are in a sad place. Letting their misery stop you from building your business is a choice rooted in your own insecurity, not a rational response to feedback.
Instead of seeking feedback broadly, prioritize 'believability-weighted' input from a community of vetted experts. Knowing the track record, specific expertise, and conviction levels of those offering advice allows you to filter signal from noise and make more informed investment decisions.
Trying to win universal approval is a futile goal. The speaker points out that even Ray Dalio, a multi-billionaire sharing wisdom on TikTok, gets ruthlessly criticized by uninformed commenters. This proves that criticism often stems from ignorance, not valid assessment, so you should not seek validation from such sources.