Strong consumer spending over the summer was likely inflated by people purchasing goods they expected to become more expensive due to tariffs. This 'spent-up demand' suggests that future retail sales will weaken as the buying-ahead behavior ends and reverses.
Related Insights
To navigate extreme uncertainty like unpredictable tariffs, Walmart's buyers use tangible, seasonal purchasing decisions (e.g., Halloween costumes) as a framework. They run detailed "what-if" scenarios on pricing, sourcing, and consumer behavior to make concrete decisions despite ambiguity.
Instead of immediately passing tariff costs to consumers, US corporations are initially absorbing the shock. They are mitigating the impact by reducing labor costs and accepting lower profitability, which explains the lag between tariff implementation and broad consumer inflation.
Tariffs are a direct tax paid by the domestic importer, period. This functions as a significant, unacknowledged fiscal tightening by massively increasing the corporate tax bill. This drain on the economy is a primary driver of the current recessionary impulse, contrary to political narratives.
The inflation market's reaction to tariff news has fundamentally shifted. Unlike in the past, recent tariff threats failed to raise front-end inflation expectations. This indicates investors are now more concerned about the negative impact on economic growth and labor markets than the direct pass-through to consumer prices.
A surge in business technology investment was misinterpreted as an AI-powered economic boom. It more likely reflected companies front-loading purchases of semiconductors and electronics to avoid paying impending 25% tariffs, rather than a fundamental acceleration in AI-related capital expenditure.
The negative economic impact of tariffs was weaker than forecast because key transmission channels failed to materialize. A lack of foreign retaliation, a depreciating dollar that boosted exports, and a surprisingly strong stock market prevented the anticipated tightening of financial conditions.
The Fed expects inflation from tariffs to be a temporary phenomenon, peaking in Q1 before subsiding. This view allows policymakers to "look through" the temporary price spike and focus on what they see as a more pressing risk: a cooling labor market. This trade-off is described as the "cost of providing insurance to the labor market."
Robert Kaplan cautions against dismissing inflation risks. Many businesses are still absorbing tariff costs or working through pre-tariff inventory. He believes the full price impact will be passed on to consumers in 2026, potentially keeping inflation stickier than markets currently expect.
The economic impact of tariffs is not an immediate, one-time price adjustment. Instead, Boston Fed President Collins characterizes it as a "long one-off" process where the full effect can take months or even a year to filter through the economy. This prolonged adjustment period extends uncertainty and complicates inflation forecasting.
Tariffs are creating a stagflationary effect on the economy. This is visible in PMI data, which shows muted business activity while the "prices paid" component remains high. This combination of slowing growth and rising costs acts as a significant "speed break" on the economy without stopping it entirely.
