Authoritarian leaders attack bureaucracy not to enhance democracy, but to replace institutional competence with personal loyalty. Experts loyal to professional standards are a threat. Destroying bureaucratic competence through patrimonialism (treating the state as personal property) is a distinct, earlier stage before an organized, ideological fascist takeover.
Authoritarian figures generate a high volume of daily outrages to prevent sustained focus on their overarching project. Using a strong, organizing label like 'fascism' is not merely an insult but a crucial cognitive tool. It helps the public categorize events into a larger pattern, maintaining focus on the big picture instead of getting lost in the noise.
The killing of a legally armed citizen by federal agents, an act directly repudiating Second Amendment principles, failed to provoke outrage from its staunchest defenders. This silence suggests their proclaimed fear of government tyranny is secondary to partisan loyalty, revealing that the gun rights movement may not be the check on state power it claims to be.
Historically, figures like Hitler were initially dismissed as buffoons. This perceived lack of seriousness is a strategic tactic, not a flaw. It disarms civil opponents who can't operate in that space, captures constant media attention, and causes observers to fatally underestimate the true threat. The defense to "take him seriously, not literally" is a modern manifestation of this pattern.