Analyst Ben Thompson posits that Meta's passive, dream-like Vibes app is a better strategy for mass consumption than Sora's meme-focused, creator-centric tool, which he finds tiring. The key is serving the 90% of consumers, not just the 1% of creators or 9% of editors.
Related Insights
The backlash to Meta's AI video feed "Vibes" stemmed from its impersonal, generic content. This contrasts with ChatGPT's viral "Studio Ghibli" filter, which succeeded by letting users apply an AI aesthetic to their own photos. Successful consumer AI must empower self-expression, not just serve curated assets.
The obvious social play for OpenAI is to embed collaborative features within ChatGPT, leveraging its utility. Instead, the company launched Sora, a separate entertainment app. This focus on niche content creation over core product utility is a questionable strategy for building a lasting social network.
AI video tools like Sora optimize for high production value, but popular internet content often succeeds due to its message and authenticity, not its polish. The assumption that better visuals create better engagement is a risky product bet, as it iterates on an axis that users may not value.
Ben Thompson argues that ChatGPT succeeded because the creator was also the consumer, receiving immediate, personalized value. In contrast, AI video is created for an audience. He questions whether Sora's easily-made content is compelling enough for anyone other than the creator to watch, posing a major consumption hurdle.
OpenAI has a strategic conflict: its public narrative aligns with Apple's model of selling a high-value tool directly to users. However, its internal metrics and push for engagement suggest a pivot towards Meta's attention-based model to justify its massive valuation and compute costs.
Learning from Instagram's evolution towards passive consumption, the Sora team intentionally designs its social feed to inspire creation, not just scrolling. This fundamentally changes the platform's incentives and is proving successful, with high rates of daily active creation and posting.
Unlike traditional social media's 1% creator rule, OpenAI's Sora sees 70% of its users actively creating content. This makes the platform a "lean-forward" experience, more akin to an immersive video game than a passive "lean-back" feed like Instagram.
Unlike traditional social media's 1% creation rate, 70% of Sora users create content. This high engagement, driven by low-friction tools, positions Sora as a 'lean forward' interactive experience more akin to video games than passive 'lean back' consumption feeds.
The race to integrate AI and social interaction has two distinct strategies. OpenAI is adding group chats to its AI utility ("putting people in the AI"). Conversely, Meta is adding AI agents into its established messaging apps ("putting AI in the chat"). This framing highlights the different starting points and strategic challenges for each company.
Meta and OpenAI's same-day launches reveal a strategic split. Meta’s generic AI video feed, "Vibes," was poorly received as "slop." In contrast, OpenAI’s "Pulse" offers personalized, high-utility content, showcasing a superior strategy of personal intelligence over mass-market AI entertainment.