Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Leaders often delay reorgs and then "cram" multiple objectives into one event. While the official reason is business strategy, underlying goals often include setting up high performers for success, retaining key talent with juicier roles, or managing out others.

Related Insights

Companies mistakenly bundle management with authority, forcing top performers onto a management track to gain influence. Separate them. Define management's role as coordination and context-sharing, allowing senior individual contributors to drive decisions without managing people.

The objective of an effective organizational flattening is to streamline the interactions and dependencies between teams, not just to remove people from an org chart. Companies that focus on redesigning workflows and communication patterns first, using frameworks like Team Topologies, achieve sustainable efficiency.

In high-growth environments, constant reorganization is inevitable and should be treated as a strategic tool for growth. Instead of fearing reorgs, leaders should anticipate future needs, hire for roles that will be critical in 1-2 years, and build a culture that expects and adapts to structural change.

To avoid repeating the Bob Chapek succession "fiasco," Disney's board deliberately structured the process to retain the runner-up. By creating a new President and Chief Creative Officer role, they ensured the finalist had a strong partner and prevented a disruptive executive exit.

Leaders focus on increasing reports because headcount is an objective metric for promotion, unlike subjective assessments of business impact. This creates an incentive for managers to accumulate people, even if it's not the most impactful business decision.

A company’s true values aren't in its mission statement, but in its operational systems. Good intentions are meaningless without supporting structures. What an organization truly values is revealed by its compensation systems, promotion decisions, and which behaviors are publicly celebrated and honored.

When companies approach delayering as a cost-cutting measure driven by spreadsheets and salaries—without considering the capabilities being lost—they are committing 'organizational vandalism.' This approach ignores the complex web of interactions and processes that middle management supports, leading to systemic failure.

To avoid bureaucratic stagnation, favor promoting ambitious internal employees to middle management. These individuals, often aspiring to higher roles like CEO, are driven to perform and less likely to become the complacent, process-oriented managers who stifle growth.

Frequent organizational change, such as reorgs, serves as a natural filter. People who are uncomfortable with flux will self-select out, leaving a team that is more adaptable and aligned with a fast-moving company's needs.

Employee retention now requires a customized approach beyond generic financial incentives. Effective managers must identify whether an individual is driven by work-life balance, ego-gratifying titles, or money, and then transparently tailor their role and its associated trade-offs to that primary motivator.